Changes

{{Wiki | wiki_logo logo = http://wikiindexconservapedia.orgcom/imagesskins/fcommon/f7images/Conservlogoconservlogo.png| wiki_URL URL = http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page| wiki_recentchanges_URL recentchanges URL= http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:RecentchangesRecentChanges| wiki_wikinode_URL wikinode URL = http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:WikiNode| wiki_status about URL = Vibranthttp://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:About| wiki_language mobile URL = No <!--http://m.YourWikiURL.org - If none, use 'No'-->|status = Active|language = English| wiki_editmode editmode = LoginToEdit| wiki_engine engine = MediaWiki| wiki_maintopic license = NoLicense|maintopic = Encyclopedia|backupurl = <!--backup file URL, found at '/Special:Statistics' on Wikia & other MediaWiki sites-->|backupdate = 2013-MM-DD <!--ISO date of backup URL, if unknown, type 'unknown date'-->

'''Conservapedia''' is an encyclopedia written with a The site was started in November {{tag|conservativeFoundedIn2006|2006}} viewpoint; specifically, Conservapediaby [[wp:Andrew Schlafly|Andrew Schlafly]] (presently the site's articles are politically conservative, friendly to young Earth creationism only active [[bureaucrat]]) and conservative Christianitya group of home-schooled people to provide an alternative to the perceived anti-Christian, pro-Evolution, anti-American and USAanti-centricconservative bias of [[English Wikipedia|Wikipedia]]. Conservapedia The stated purpose of the site is in general hostile to liberalsprovide a family-friendly resource for home-schooled children from fundamentalist Christian homes. However, homosexuals, and people who support or teach the theory of evolution or special or general relativitya few more {{tag|Adult content|adult topics}} such as [[cp:Homosexuality|homosexuality]] are also treated in depth from their viewpoint.

The site was started in November 2006 by Andrew Schlafly and a group ==Technical shortcomings==Conservapedia cannot be edited during certain hours of homeschooled people the night, U.S. time, except by users with special "night editing" rights, to provide prevent [[vandal]]s from striking when most if not all of the [[Sysop|administrators]] are asleep. This is rather inconvenient since an alternative editor may begin editing an article but not be able to save his edit if the perceived antideadline passes while he is working on his revision. He cannot even store it on-Christianwiki for saving later, pro-Evolution, anti-American and anti-conservative bias of since Conservapedia doesn't have [[Wikipediamw:Extension:Checkpoint]]. The stated purpose of installed; the site only option is to provide a family-friendly resource hit the browser's Back button and copy and paste the the revision text into some other pastebin, for homeschooled children from fundamentalist Christian homessaving to Conservapedia later. HoweverThe site does not even state why the edit is disallowed or when or if the restriction will end, a few more adult topics such as but merely says "The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Administrators, edit", leaving the user to possibly think that his editing rights have been revoked or that editing Conservapedia is [[http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality homosexualityCategory:ByInvitation|by invitation only]] are also treated in depth from their viewpoint.

Conservapedia cannot be edited during nighttime, Ualso has no email notification user preferences options available; this significantly limits potential for maintaining user engagement.S[https://bugzilla. timewikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45022] It is no wonder, except by users with special "night editing" rightsthen, to prevent vandals from striking when all or most that the site has fewer than 200 users (fewer than 80 of whom have the administrators are asleepcoveted "edit" right)[http://conservapedia. Conservapedia is frequently offline and favors a very liberal deletion policycom/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&limit=80&group=edit] who have edited the site in the last 91 days.

Conservapedia is frequently offline (sometimes for days at a time) and favors a very liberal deletion policy. At the start of November 2010, account creation was turned off and prospective users must now email the site owner to have an account created. This followed several months during which account creation was disabled most of the time and most new users were being blocked on sight. Account creation is still occasionally enabled, although most accounts created in this manner are immediately blocked. In December 2010, Conservapedia started to block certain ranges of [[A Storehouse of KnowledgeIP editors|IP addresses]] was from even viewing the site. Many IP ranges in the [[:Category:United Kingdom|UK]], [[:Category:France|France]], [[:Category:Germany|Germany]] and other [[:Category:Europe|European]] countries now receive a 403 error when trying to load any page. [[New Conservapedia]] has been set up by former Conservapedia editors who were dissatisfied with to parody Conservapedia.

{{Size<!--see Template:Size for full detail-->| wiki_statistics_URL pages= 40250 <!--type the plain number of pages - NO thousands separators-->|statistics URL= http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Statistics?action=raw| wiki_pages = 33991| wikiFactor = 92118 <!--preferred; if unknown leave void; see: Category:wikiFactor for help-->| wikiFactor URL = http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:PopularPages&limit=150}}(As of: 08 January 2014)<!--manually add/amend date when stats are verified and/or updated-->

As of 9 26 July 20102013, Conservapedia had 3655,656 000 registered usersuser accounts, most of whom which are blocked, with 31 administrators. There are 36 Administrators348 users had made an edit in the preceding 91 days.

 * As it says on Conservapedia's user creation page, "User names based on your real name or initials are preferred" [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup], but are not required. While some users with names like [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:HertyA HertyA] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Lainy74 Lainy74] are blocked and told to create a new name, other users with names like [http[cp://www.conservapedia.com/User:TK |"TK"]] and [http[cp://www.conservapedia.com/User:Foxtrot |"Foxtrot"]], (both users who later gained blocking rights) were not.* Conservapedia's [http[cp://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:90/10_rule 10 rule|"90/10 rule"]] states that "unproductive activity, such as 90% talk page edits and only 10% quality edits to Conservapedia articles, may result in blocking of the account". New users are often surprised to find out that these numbers are not strictly followed, and can sometimes be blocked before making 10 total edits, especially if their edits are argumentative or questioning of the wiki. It is best to first establish yourself by making constructive edits to articles before trying to delve into the more controversial subjects.* Be wary of disagreeing with a [[sysop]]. They may block you for disagreeing, though this may be unlikely if you are following all the other rules (including 90/10). Reverting any edits by a sysop will likely result in a ban.* Be wary of an abundant use of <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags on articles, especially if you could add the citations yourself. This practice is often viewed as "ideologically-motivated tagging", and is frowned upon on Conservapedia.* Conservapedia is a conservative, creationist encyclopedia. As such, it is best not to post anything that might be construed as "liberally biased" or "pro-evolution". Even if you feel the Conservapedia arguments against evolution are flawed saying so can lead to a block. The drop menu for those with blocking power includes, "Liberal vandalism, Liberal name calling, Liberal parodist" [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Ipbreason-dropdown&direction=next&oldid=616544]* Do not write rude or offensive material about another user, especially don't disparage a sysop. Do not imitate users in high standing who [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&curid=78585&diff=592439&oldid=592419 can be very critical]. Ordinary users do not have the same freedom.* If you get blocked for any of these reasons and you think the block was unfair, '''do not''' create a new account. Instead, email the administrator or user who blocked you and appeal for a second chance. Most users are granted leniency and are allowed to edit again. This applies especially to those who did not know they did anything wrong since many get blocked without realizing they did anything wrong.** If the sysop who blocked you does not have email enabled, you can appeal to another sysop. This is against their [http[cp://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse#TK |new policy]], but the worst they can do is block you for all eternity.* If Aschafly accuses you of being a Liberal, don't bother denying try it, as that's just [http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_denial Liberal Denial], [http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_deceit Liberal Deceit], a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Liberal_Falsehoods Liberal Falsehood], [http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_hypocrisy Liberal Hypocrisy], and [http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_obfuscation Liberal Obfuscation]. All you can do at that point is confess your sins and plead for mercy, and Andy may condescend to allow you stay, as long as you never post anything else he disagrees withanyway.* Avoid posting using the same user name as you use on any site critical of Conservapedia, '''especially''' [[RationalWiki]]. That can be [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:StevenB&action=history a banning offense], [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:HelpJazz HelpJazz] was blocked for this though TK who blocked him aspires to be a [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:TK&oldid=110566 bureaucrat at RationalWiki]. Conservapedia claims [http[cp://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:How_Conservapedia_Differs_from_Wikipedia they claim How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia|not to do that (#15)]].*If Aschafly accuses you of being a Liberal, don't bother denying it, as that's just [[cp:Liberal denial|Liberal Denial]], [[cp:Liberal deceit|Liberal Deceit]], a [[cp:Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehood]], [[cp:Liberal hypocrisy|Liberal Hypocrisy]], and [[cp:Liberal obfuscation|Liberal Obfuscation]]. All you can do at that point is apologize, and Andy may condescend to allow you to stay, as long as you never post anything else he disagrees with.

*[[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] was set up by former Conservapedia editors who were dissatisfied with Conservapedia.*[[RationalWiki]], an '''entire wiki''' originally founded to criticize and make fun of Conservapedia, now also criticizes pseudo-science in general.*[[Liberapedia]], the a parody wiki of Conservapediathat has a liberal bias*[[New Conservapedia]] another parody that claims Conservapedia has a liberal bias

[[Category:Political]][[Category:Christianity]][[Category:FoundedIn2006]][[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]][[Category:Internet <!--this wiki is not about internet censorship]]and therefor technically does not belong in the category-->