Category:Places is now deprecated and not used
I dunno really. I've linked between them for the time being -- Harry Wood 18:36, 5 Feb 2006 (EST)
- Category:Places is now deprecated and not used. Please see Category talk:Places for details. TedErnst | talk 12:29, 26 November 2006 (EST)
Some wikis are not called (eg) Maastricht wiki, but Wikimaas, and thus get listed under W instead of M. This is not intuitive.
Cities as it's own thing
The following discussion originally took place on the talk page of the "Places" category. Since then the category "Wiki Location" has become the de facto root node for everything geographic. The "new plan" referred to here was using "Plcaes" the way "Earth" is now being used. The objection and it's resolution lead to the current plan as of the end of Oct 2006 with "Wiki Location" being a root node for everything geographic with "Earth" rooting a tree of places and a special "Cities" category also a subcat of "Wiki Location".
Love your energy on this new plan, Jennifer. Just one thought. Wikis about cities are special. I'm not sure they're more special than wikis about countries or states or anything else, but I want to make sure we don't lose the fact that WikiMaas is about a city when it's categorized in it's correct place in the place hierarchy. Know what I mean? TedErnst | talk 14:26, 19 October 2006 (EDT)
- Yeah, I also think that "city" is a privileged kind of location. It's "meaningfulness to people" goes all the way back to city states and greek philsophy on the proper role of a person in a "polis". Plus it's deeply entwined with dialects and economic communities and on and on...
- Actually I think maybe I have a solution (how does it sound?): Make "Wiki List" contain a category called "Wiki Place" for "place-ish categories". Then you have a root node "Earth" (which works better than "ageographic" for wikis that aren't restricted to local issues) that leads to the whole tree structure of places on Earth proposed above. Parrallel to "Earth" you can have a category for "Polis" or "City" or whatever. So if you want a wiki that's only about something in London it would go in "Category:London" but if the subject of the wiki was "all and only London itself" then the wiki would go in "Category:London" AND "Category:Polis"...
- Sound good? (I like the idea of naming the Category "Polis" but whatever your favorite term is I'll go with that. What do you like?)
- - JenniferForUnity 01:38, 20 October 2006 (EDT)
- Yeah, the more I thought about it the more "Cities" makes sense to me too just in terms of people using it alread and it being easy to find. Cool, cool :-) - JenniferForUnity 13:56, 20 October 2006 (EDT)
- Note: in order to assist readability of included pages, please ensure the template rendering this table is kept at the BOTTOM of the displayed page.
This is the text of the Template:CategoryDiscussions. It is intended to connect the various discussions about categories here on WikiIndex that are taking place (or have previously taken place) on various pages. Please also see WikiIndex:How do categories work, and how to use our template:Tag. If you find a discussion on categories which does not display this message box, please add this template by copying the following
You can also check all pages that link to this template.