Proposal:Ordering on this page

Proposal 17-Feb-2006: ordering on this page
I re-ordered this page to put newest at the bottom to encourge us to deal with the older ones first, and move them off this page. Also, don't know if you know about this feature, but there is a + item next to the "edit" link at the top of talk pages. That feature adds a new section, without having to edit the whole page. Since that new section goes at the bottom, this re-organization allows that feature to be used on this page. TedErnst | talk 12:10, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)


 * I think that the page should be added to the top, not withstanding the section editing function. It is more friendly to read new proposals at the top. MarkDilley | talk
 * Mark, if this was moved to the archive in error, please move it back to the Proposals page so it can be further discussed. I also invite you to go further in your reasoning as it's feeling like "because I said so" again.  TedErnst | talk 22:47, 19 Feb 2006 (EST)
 * Mark, tell us more why this is still active? TedErnst | talk 13:06, 21 Feb 2006 (EST)

Yes, and I propose that we make an area for the proposals we've moved off this list, perhaps "" or something like that --Raymond King | talk 18:40, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)


 * ProposalArchive and Guidelines, agreed upon, would be more specific to what happened to the ideas. MarkDilley | talk
 * Guidelines will be sufficient for positive decisions, and ProposalArchive for history of all these conversations. TedErnst | talk 13:06, 21 Feb 2006 (EST)
 * I agree --Raymond King | talk 03:20, 23 Feb 2006 (EST)

Wikifying the list has definately made this proposal non grata. MarkDilley