User talk:MarkDilley/Archive3: Difference between revisions

Any change in your thoughts now that you know there's a reason?  peace, [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 08:44, 17 May 2006 (EDT)

Yes, you're right.  I was mixed up.  And yet, doesn't a [[wiki farm]] page that shows up as a category still end up becoming a sub-category?  And isn't that one thing we were trying to avoid with wiki engines?  Seems like a parallel issue to me.  I dunno. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:12, 19 May 2006 (EDT)

****''I think of it more as a process, not only because we didn't want to spend the time on it.'' [[MarkDilley]]

***** Sorry, I shouldn't have tried to guess why we didn't fill in the structured data.  We each have our own reasons at the time we do it.  The reasons don't really matter.  What matters is that we do it, and that's not a problem at all, incremental improvements are great! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:02, 22 May 2006 (EDT)

: I suppose what I'm getting at is that this used to be a 2 step process.  Step 1 was putting in the sturctureed data and step 2 was going back to fix any data that was still missing.  I get myself in a different frame of mind if I'm just looking for edit modes and don't have to worry about other structured data.  I work differently when I'm doing step 1 or step 2.  This change that we're discussing seems to have eliminated the 2 step process which makes it harder for me to work in the way I want to work.  Is this any clearer?  If not, happening tonight? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:29, 22 May 2006 (EDT)

==Time zones==

: ''I have no idea! :-) [[MarkDilley]]''

I didn't know it was possible to have folksonomy in the structured data.  I learn so much from you!  Doesn't it need to now be listed as one of our status categoires? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:39, 11 June 2006 (EDT)

Not poking fun.  You saw my reaction to "Building".  I changed it to active.  You changed it back and I am seeing now that that's how things evolve with wiki.  We can't, even if we wanted to, control everything and decide in advance how things are going to work.  In some ways it's strange that we have structured data at all.  So far I think this is the first example of a structured data category being created by someone other than "us."  That's pretty cool if we let it happen.  Good stuff.  And sorry that it felt like I was poking fun.  Your radical inclusiveness is somehow not obvious to me, yet it's definitely where I want to go. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:38, 12 June 2006 (EDT)

[[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 10:41, 14 June 2006 (EDT)

Bonjour Mark.  Currently a long time I've not been here and not a lot of time to make any ''french-synchro-translation''. I'd be interested to have your opinion on the opportunity/way to bridge some Microformats-wiki with the [[WikiIndex:Structured data|structured data]] project ? Completely newbie on the subject, but the perspectives seem to be interesting. -- [[Christophe Ducamp]] | &lt;small&gt;[[User talk:ChristopheDucamp|talk]] 07:10, 15 June 2006 (EDT)

==The timezone...==

==[[TransWiki]]==