Zyprexa: Difference between revisions

76 bytes removed ,  29 July
m
no edit summary
(some structured data added)
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wiki
{{Wiki
| wiki_logo             = http://www.wikiindex.org/images/e/e6/NoLogo.png<!--or a/a7/NoLogoYet.png-->
|logo             = No
| wiki_URL               = http://zyprexa.pbwiki.com
|URL               = http://zyprexa.pbwiki.com
| wiki_recentchanges_URL = No
|recentchanges URL = No
| wiki_wikinode_URL     = No
|wikinode URL     = No
| wiki_status           = Active
|status           = Active
| wiki_language         = English
|language         = English
| wiki_editmode         = LoginToEdit
|editmode         = LoginToEdit
| wiki_engine           = Pbwiki
|engine           = PBwiki
| wiki_maintopic         = Medical
|maintopic         = Pharmaceuticals
}}
}}
==Description==
==Description==
{{add}}
For the past few years, there has been some controversy about the drug {{tag|Zyprexa}}. What we all know is that Zyprexa is an "atypical" neuroleptic (also known as an "anti-psychotic"), approved to treat schizophrenia and acute mania. At about $2.50/pill, it is a big money-maker for Eli Lilly, somewhere on the order of 4 billion dollars per year. By themselves, these facts are not controversial.


For the past few years, there has been some controversy about the drug {{tag|Zyprexa}}. What we all know is that Zyprexa is an "atypical" neuroleptic (also known as an "anti-psychotic"), approved to treat schizophrenia and acute mania. At about $2.50/pill, it is a big money maker for Eli Lilly, somewhere on the order of $4 Billion a year. By themselves these facts are not controversial.
However, it seems that some internal memos indicate that Eli Lilly knew that the {{tag|drugs|drug}} raised the risk of {{tag|diabetes}} in patients, and didn't act appropriately. They may have even misreported clinical trial data about blood-sugar risks to doctors. There is currently a class-action lawsuit underway to hold Lilly accountable. These memos indicate that Lilly initiated an internal marketting campaign to willfully downplay these deleterious effects.
 
However, it seems that some internal memos indicate that Eli Lilly knew that the drug raised the risk of diabetes in patients and didn't act appropriately. They may have even misreported clinical trial data about blood-sugar risks to doctors. There is currently a class action lawsuit underway to hold Lilly accountable. These memos indicate that Lilly initiated an internal marketing campaign to willfully downplay these deleterious effects.


There may be other risks that the company knew about but was hiding.
There may be other risks that the company knew about but was hiding.
Line 21: Line 20:
Incidentally, Lilly's second most profitable drugs treat diabetes.
Incidentally, Lilly's second most profitable drugs treat diabetes.


Furthermore, Lilly has been training sales reps to instruct general practitioners to prescribe Zyprexa, off label, to elderly patients exhibiting general symptoms of dementia. These drugs are dangerous enough in the hands of specialists - general practitioners should not be trained by salespeople to prescribe such potent and dangerous psychopharmaceuticals. Lilly called this marketing initiative Viva Zyprexa, from which we have taken our satirical name for this campaign - Zyprexa Kills.
Furthermore, Lilly has been training sales reps to instruct general practitioners to prescribe Zyprexa, off-label, to elderly patients who exhibit general symptoms of dementia. These drugs are dangerous enough in the hands of specialists; general practitioners shoud not be trained by salespeople to prescribe such potent and dangerous psychopharmaceuticals. Lilly called this marketting initiative Viva Zyprexa, from which we have taken our satirical name for this campaign - Zyprexa Kills.
 


{{Size
{{Size
| wiki_statistics_URL    = No
|statistics URL = http://zyprexa.pbwiki.com/AllPages
| wiki_size              = YourWikiSize
|pages = 23
}}
}}
[[Category:Medical]]