User talk:Rh: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(→welcome!: do-ocracy) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Thanks for the friendly welcome :-) | :Thanks for the friendly welcome :-) | ||
:Good to read about the redirects. I was unsure at first, because I didn't find any hints how redirects are handled on this wiki. --[[User:Rh|Rh]] 07:50, 28 September 2006 (EDT) | :Good to read about the redirects. I was unsure at first, because I didn't find any hints how redirects are handled on this wiki. --[[User:Rh|Rh]] 07:50, 28 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
We haven't developed a lot of "policy" as yet, still relying more or less on the wiki way and a do-ocracy. If you want it done, do it! :-) [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:21, 28 September 2006 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:21, 28 September 2006
Just to let you know, we've been hardlinking wiki logos to the wiki urls. — User:Sean Fennel@ 15:51, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
- Hi Sean, yes, I already thought so ;-) Presumably you mean this edit, hmm, that was stupid c&p from the duplicate entry. Sorry for that one. But most other entries I've worked on, like [1], and especially the new ones, should use hardlinking. Thanks for the clear tip. --Rh 01:00, 25 September 2006 (EDT)
welcome!
Just wanted to say hi and thank you for all the work you've been doing the past few days. The redirects are especially helpful, I think. peace, TedErnst | talk 12:54, 26 September 2006 (EDT)
- Thanks for the friendly welcome :-)
- Good to read about the redirects. I was unsure at first, because I didn't find any hints how redirects are handled on this wiki. --Rh 07:50, 28 September 2006 (EDT)
We haven't developed a lot of "policy" as yet, still relying more or less on the wiki way and a do-ocracy. If you want it done, do it! :-) TedErnst | talk 15:21, 28 September 2006 (EDT)