Template talk:Tag: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(ted's thoughts) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
It seems you want to have some tags inline. We could have a [[Template:Inline-Tag]] for that. The current tag template is for bulletted lists. Elsewhere, you seem to want tags to not show up on the page at all, which doesn't need a template, just put the category:whatever somewhere on the page (anywhere!). [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 21:37, 22 Jan 2006 (EST) | It seems you want to have some tags inline. We could have a [[Template:Inline-Tag]] for that. The current tag template is for bulletted lists. Elsewhere, you seem to want tags to not show up on the page at all, which doesn't need a template, just put the category:whatever somewhere on the page (anywhere!). [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 21:37, 22 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
:I think these tags are not really wonderful, you have to use the name of the category within the text, that's stupid. --[[Wolf Peuker|Peu]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 14:20, 27 October 2006 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:20, 27 October 2006
Tags are wonderful!
There are some issues that we have to sort out.
- tags within the text of descriptions are desireable.
- if this is true, how do we code a tag so as to be seemless in the text of the description. see DreamHost for testing.
- tags that are bullet listed are desireable.
It seems you want to have some tags inline. We could have a Template:Inline-Tag for that. The current tag template is for bulletted lists. Elsewhere, you seem to want tags to not show up on the page at all, which doesn't need a template, just put the category:whatever somewhere on the page (anywhere!). TedErnst 21:37, 22 Jan 2006 (EST)