User contributions for Lumenos
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
17 September 2009
- 16:2316:23, 17 September 2009 diff hist +51 RationalWiki (en) made comments to editors only visible when editing, reordered
- 00:5800:58, 17 September 2009 diff hist +2 The Matrix No edit summary
- 00:1200:12, 17 September 2009 diff hist +265 Template:Newest additions added Lumeniki, converted some date formats to standard
16 September 2009
- 23:5223:52, 16 September 2009 diff hist −482 Lumeniki removed some comments (comment links to Nx's user page were changed to point to his talk page because he allows this to be edited by others)
- 23:3823:38, 16 September 2009 diff hist +343 Talk:Biohack Site is down presently
- 23:2923:29, 16 September 2009 diff hist +132 N Talk:OneVillage New page: Have you checked the website? There is no wiki there only products for sale. ~~~~
- 20:2320:23, 16 September 2009 diff hist +1,063 User talk:This is not the solution →Next steps
- 17:1517:15, 16 September 2009 diff hist +1,961 User talk:This is not the solution →Next steps
15 September 2009
- 23:4823:48, 15 September 2009 diff hist +602 User talk:This is not the solution →Next steps: It seems this dispute is not between the editors and each other, but rather that the administration does not want them using WikiIndex to have disputes.
- 22:4222:42, 15 September 2009 diff hist +1,618 User talk:This is not the solution →Next steps: Please don't lock down the whole wiki
- 15:3315:33, 15 September 2009 diff hist +224 User:Lumenos/WikiIndex (unwritten) policies No edit summary
- 15:2315:23, 15 September 2009 diff hist +387 User:Lumenos/WikiIndex (unwritten) policies →Notes to editors of this page: "Privacy" concerns
- 02:1102:11, 15 September 2009 diff hist −484 User:Lumenos/WikiIndex (unwritten) policies →Notes to editors of this page
14 September 2009
- 20:0320:03, 14 September 2009 diff hist +365 WikiIndex talk:Policies and Guidelines →Previous contents were moved
- 19:5019:50, 14 September 2009 diff hist 0 m User:Lumenos/WikiIndex (unwritten) policies User:Lumenos/WikiIndex policies (and drama) moved to User:Lumenos/WikiIndex (unwritten) policies: try to make this a bit less snarky
- 15:1815:18, 14 September 2009 diff hist −572 User:Lumenos →About that RationalWiki talk page: (deleted)
- 15:1515:15, 14 September 2009 diff hist +145 User:Lumenos The old "policy development" page, which I did most of the work on can be found on me subpage.
- 15:1115:11, 14 September 2009 diff hist −14 m User:Lumenos/WikiIndex (unwritten) policies →Common sense proposal: signature update
- 15:0315:03, 14 September 2009 diff hist +480 WikiIndex talk:Policies and Guidelines Previous contents were moved
- 14:5214:52, 14 September 2009 diff hist −43,499 WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines Replaced page with Bob's suggestion, based on Dilley's comment here.
- 14:3814:38, 14 September 2009 diff hist +663 User:Lumenos/WikiIndex (unwritten) policies added back the notice that this page will likely be copied to Lumeniki. This may be a privacy concern for some editors (some may have left for this reason).
- 14:3414:34, 14 September 2009 diff hist +44,074 N User:Lumenos/WikiIndex (unwritten) policies This is a page about what to expect of the administration or other editors. It is not exactly only about "policy" as set by the administration. See last post at bottom of page.
- 14:0114:01, 14 September 2009 diff hist +1,034 User talk:Huw Powell reply to Huw and Dilley
- 02:0502:05, 14 September 2009 diff hist +179 User talk:This is not the solution →Next steps: I've left messages with all the sysops that have activity this year, requesting that they vote to unprotect the articles. ~~~~
13 September 2009
- 23:3523:35, 13 September 2009 diff hist +580 User talk:Sean Fennel request to unprotect wiki articles
- 23:3323:33, 13 September 2009 diff hist +405 User talk:Peu request to unprotect wiki articles
- 23:2923:29, 13 September 2009 diff hist +580 User talk:Comets request to unprotect wiki articles
- 23:2723:27, 13 September 2009 diff hist +576 User talk:EarthFurst request to unprotect wiki articles
- 23:2523:25, 13 September 2009 diff hist +585 User talk:MarvelZuvembie request to unprotect articles
- 23:2223:22, 13 September 2009 diff hist +580 User talk:Elassint request to unprotect articles
- 23:2023:20, 13 September 2009 diff hist +580 User talk:Spud Gun request to unprotect articles
- 23:1823:18, 13 September 2009 diff hist +584 User talk:Felix request to vote to unprotect article
- 22:2522:25, 13 September 2009 diff hist +191 User talk:This is not the solution →Next steps: (The reason I put my signature on every paragraph is so that you can insert a reply under any paragraph, should you wish to do so. ~~~~)
- 21:3021:30, 13 September 2009 diff hist +2,684 User talk:This is not the solution →Next steps: I'm not sure there was any way for you to prevent things getting "out of hand" and I think you have done more than any of the rest of the administration, to help resolve conflicts
- 21:2421:24, 13 September 2009 diff hist +1,129 WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines →Administrative powers: Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 Sysops and 3 people involved in the conflict]". When ''what'' is agreed upon? The only people I've come across, who seem to possi
- 19:4519:45, 13 September 2009 diff hist −6 m WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines No edit summary
- 19:3219:32, 13 September 2009 diff hist +198 WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines →Administrative powers: I propose that the administration '''not''' protect articles, simply because there is "edit warring" over them, unless someone requests protection. If an administrator pers
- 19:3019:30, 13 September 2009 diff hist +114 WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines →Editor's powers: * '''Request administrative action:''' Request one of the following administrative actions listed under "Administrative powers".
- 19:1019:10, 13 September 2009 diff hist +51 WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines →Administrative powers: * '''Oversite:''' I believe this means removing something from edit histories, logs, etc.
- 19:0819:08, 13 September 2009 diff hist +146 WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines →Administrative powers: * Relocating an article about a wiki, to the talk page, and locking the article: I propose that this not be done unless someone involved in the conflict, requests it.
- 18:5818:58, 13 September 2009 diff hist +144 Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge →Vote for re-insertion
- 18:5618:56, 13 September 2009 diff hist +143 Talk:Liberapedia (Wikia) →Vote for re-insertion
- 18:3018:30, 13 September 2009 diff hist +142 Talk:RationalWikiWiki →Vote for re-insertion: * ~~~~ Vote to unlock the article page (not an endorsement of any version of the article).
- 18:2518:25, 13 September 2009 diff hist −8 m WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines →Common sense proposal: The Man is totally screwing with my edits
12 September 2009
- 23:4323:43, 12 September 2009 diff hist +121 m Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 →Move to article page - vote: :I moved it to RationalWiki (temp). ~~~~
- 23:3423:34, 12 September 2009 diff hist +162 Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 →Vote for re-insertion: --~~~~ (This here is a vote to unprotect the article page, not an endorsement of any version of the article.)
- 23:2923:29, 12 September 2009 diff hist +1 m WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines →Administrative powers
- 23:1323:13, 12 September 2009 diff hist +24 WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines →Your comments may be edited by others: bolding Dilley's comments
- 23:0923:09, 12 September 2009 diff hist +232 WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines The rest of the "policies" don't exist (or they are unwritten) aside from "spam". This seemed to be a source of confusion and conflict so I (Lumenos) made most of this article (with out asking anybody
- 22:4122:41, 12 September 2009 diff hist +224 WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines →Editor's powers: *'''Ridicule:''' IMO a fairly standard practice of the RationalWiki mafia (myself included). Try to use for the betterment of WikiIndex and the world, if possible. ~~~~