Difference between revisions of "Talk:RationalWikiWiki"
From WikiIndex
(→Controversial?: does bickering count as controversy?) |
(→Controversial?) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::: Um, have you seen the "history" for the RationalWikiWiki page? The "summary" lines on the history page seem to show some back-and-forth bickering. While I've seen much, much worse elsewhere, and I agree that "protecting" this article for 3 months is over-reacting, I wouldn't call it "nothing". | ::: Um, have you seen the "history" for the RationalWikiWiki page? The "summary" lines on the history page seem to show some back-and-forth bickering. While I've seen much, much worse elsewhere, and I agree that "protecting" this article for 3 months is over-reacting, I wouldn't call it "nothing". | ||
::: p.s. about this "refusing to acknowledge anyone pointing out the obvious" -- would you mind linking directly to the point where this allegedly obvious thing-pointing was refused acknowledgement? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 11:38, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ::: p.s. about this "refusing to acknowledge anyone pointing out the obvious" -- would you mind linking directly to the point where this allegedly obvious thing-pointing was refused acknowledgement? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 11:38, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::: Um, yes I have seen the "history" for the RationalWikiWiki page. The only edit in three weeks was [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWikiWiki&diff=70142&oldid=69008 this one] fixing a tiny grammatical error. Not very controversial. [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 12:08, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
==Move to article page - vote== | ==Move to article page - vote== | ||
Revision as of 16:08, 10 September 2009
Table of contents
When agreed upon to move to article page (see here)
RationalWikiWiki is a small Wiki that comments on RationalWiki. It was part of the ScribbleWiki Wiki farm but moved before things broke down there, and is now hosted on the same server as RationalWiki. As of August 19th it is inaccessible along with RationalWiki; see RationalWiki#Loss of service (Back online now.)
Downtime
The site is down on 22nd July ’08. I don’t know if this is temporary or permanent. Proxima Centauri 06:08, 22 July 2008 (EDT) It's back up Proxima Centauri 02:40, 23 July 2008 (EDT)
Well the site is kinda back up again but... Lumenos
Controversial?
Could somebody explain what is controversial about this article?--Bob M 14:35, 8 September 2009 (EDT)
- Nothing. Dilley has decided that all wikis related to RW are in the middle of a giant brawl which has spilled over to Wikiindex, and is refusing to acknowledge anyone pointing out the obvious. The major problem with this wiki seems to be CP syndrome: administrators being incapable of admitting they are in error or of changing their minds. Phantom Hoover 14:38, 8 September 2009 (EDT)
- Hi PH. Well, let's give then a chance to respond and assume good faith. Maybe there is a good reason for blocking this one, or maybe it was a mistake. If somebody reacted hastily no doubt they will fix it.--Bob M 14:52, 8 September 2009 (EDT)
- Um, have you seen the "history" for the RationalWikiWiki page? The "summary" lines on the history page seem to show some back-and-forth bickering. While I've seen much, much worse elsewhere, and I agree that "protecting" this article for 3 months is over-reacting, I wouldn't call it "nothing".
- p.s. about this "refusing to acknowledge anyone pointing out the obvious" -- would you mind linking directly to the point where this allegedly obvious thing-pointing was refused acknowledgement? --DavidCary 11:38, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
Move to article page - vote
Vote for re-insertion
- --Bob M 08:13, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
- Phantom Hoover 11:03, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
