Difference between revisions of "WikiIndex talk:Naming conventions"

From WikiIndex
Jump to: navigation, search
(PLEASE COMMENT)
 
(Choosing a name)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
** [[AnUnnamedMoinMoinWiki]] is a problematic name.  See also: http://dunck.us/collab/FrontPage
 
** [[AnUnnamedMoinMoinWiki]] is a problematic name.  See also: http://dunck.us/collab/FrontPage
 
*** We could use the url instead. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:44, 30 Jan 2006 (EST)
 
*** We could use the url instead. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:44, 30 Jan 2006 (EST)
 +
*** I agree, and in my humble opinion, some wiki's are not worth having in the system and can be deleted.  Of course we have to be a bit careful because sometimes an active wiki is offline for a short period of time, but there are a lot of wiki's that were no more than short lived experiments which are junking up our wiki. --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 14:37, 30 Jan 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 19:37, 30 January 2006

Choosing a name

  • What if the home link has one name and a different name appears in the welcome message?
    • Personally I think we should link to the home link, but it may be a judgement call, SpookyWiki seemed pretty straight forward to me. That text could change anytime, but the FrontPage is always the same, unless there is a code change. MarkDilley
      • I agree TedErnst
      • Yes, and I'd go with what makes for a more "specific" name if it's a toss up --Ray 23:42, 22 Jan 2006 (EST)
  • What if there is no name?
    • AnUnnamedMoinMoinWiki is a problematic name. See also: http://dunck.us/collab/FrontPage
      • We could use the url instead. TedErnst | talk 11:44, 30 Jan 2006 (EST)
      • I agree, and in my humble opinion, some wiki's are not worth having in the system and can be deleted. Of course we have to be a bit careful because sometimes an active wiki is offline for a short period of time, but there are a lot of wiki's that were no more than short lived experiments which are junking up our wiki. --Raymond King | talk 14:37, 30 Jan 2006 (EST)