Difference between revisions of "WikiIndex talk:Naming conventions"
(Headings; and a question about CamelCase) |
Harry Wood (Talk | contribs) (move discussion from 'Talk:Naming conventions') |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*** We could use the url instead. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:44, 30 Jan 2006 (EST) | *** We could use the url instead. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:44, 30 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
*** I agree, and in my humble opinion, some wiki's are not worth having in the system and can be deleted. Of course we have to be a bit careful because sometimes an active wiki is offline for a short period of time, but there are a lot of wiki's that were no more than short lived experiments which are junking up our wiki. --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 14:37, 30 Jan 2006 (EST) | *** I agree, and in my humble opinion, some wiki's are not worth having in the system and can be deleted. Of course we have to be a bit careful because sometimes an active wiki is offline for a short period of time, but there are a lot of wiki's that were no more than short lived experiments which are junking up our wiki. --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 14:37, 30 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
| − | == | + | == CamelCase? == |
All the exampleas are CamelCase, but it is not needed in MediaWiki. Is there a policy of using CamelCase for preference? [[User:Robin Patterson|robinp]] 14:14, 7 Feb 2006 (EST) | All the exampleas are CamelCase, but it is not needed in MediaWiki. Is there a policy of using CamelCase for preference? [[User:Robin Patterson|robinp]] 14:14, 7 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | If a wiki doesn't use CamelCase in it's name, do we name their page here using Camel Case? If so, why? And what about the name of the wiki in the template? Is that always the same as the pagename or can it be different? Are their two different conventions? If not, can't we just code that in the template and lose that field? If they are different, we ought to define how so. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 23:02, 27 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : As far as I understand the small discussion here at WikiIndex, I think that the WikiIndex page name should be like the name of the wiki. The name in the template is something that I have always made the same as the page name, which is the same as the Wiki. Triple redundancy baby! :-) Just like the categories! Could we code it? Not I, you? :-) (if so, can you map the logo_url to the wiki_url?) [[MarkDilley]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | I can take a shot at coding that. Where's that list of codes? I can't find it anywhere. It had tons of triple curly brackets on it. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 10:11, 2 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, it's not clear to me what our convention is. It seems we're using CamelCase most of the time, even when the wiki in question doesn't use CamelCase. I don't understand what our convention is. I bring this up not because I care that much, but because you (Mark) pointed out an inconsistency in my work. I'm not even sure I see the inconsistency, but it's something important to you, so let's document how it should be. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 10:11, 2 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 16:39, 2 March 2006
Table of contents
Choosing a name
If wiki uses various names
- What if the home link has one name and a different name appears in the welcome message?
- Personally I think we should link to the home link, but it may be a judgement call, SpookyWiki seemed pretty straight forward to me. That text could change anytime, but the FrontPage is always the same, unless there is a code change. MarkDilley
If no name apparent
- What if there is no name?
- AnUnnamedMoinMoinWiki is a problematic name. See also: http://dunck.us/collab/FrontPage
- We could use the url instead. TedErnst | talk 11:44, 30 Jan 2006 (EST)
- I agree, and in my humble opinion, some wiki's are not worth having in the system and can be deleted. Of course we have to be a bit careful because sometimes an active wiki is offline for a short period of time, but there are a lot of wiki's that were no more than short lived experiments which are junking up our wiki. --Raymond King | talk 14:37, 30 Jan 2006 (EST)
- AnUnnamedMoinMoinWiki is a problematic name. See also: http://dunck.us/collab/FrontPage
CamelCase?
All the exampleas are CamelCase, but it is not needed in MediaWiki. Is there a policy of using CamelCase for preference? robinp 14:14, 7 Feb 2006 (EST)
If a wiki doesn't use CamelCase in it's name, do we name their page here using Camel Case? If so, why? And what about the name of the wiki in the template? Is that always the same as the pagename or can it be different? Are their two different conventions? If not, can't we just code that in the template and lose that field? If they are different, we ought to define how so. TedErnst | talk 23:02, 27 Feb 2006 (EST)
- As far as I understand the small discussion here at WikiIndex, I think that the WikiIndex page name should be like the name of the wiki. The name in the template is something that I have always made the same as the page name, which is the same as the Wiki. Triple redundancy baby! :-) Just like the categories! Could we code it? Not I, you? :-) (if so, can you map the logo_url to the wiki_url?) MarkDilley
I can take a shot at coding that. Where's that list of codes? I can't find it anywhere. It had tons of triple curly brackets on it. TedErnst | talk 10:11, 2 Mar 2006 (EST)
Also, it's not clear to me what our convention is. It seems we're using CamelCase most of the time, even when the wiki in question doesn't use CamelCase. I don't understand what our convention is. I bring this up not because I care that much, but because you (Mark) pointed out an inconsistency in my work. I'm not even sure I see the inconsistency, but it's something important to you, so let's document how it should be. TedErnst | talk 10:11, 2 Mar 2006 (EST)
