Talk:Nemo bis: Difference between revisions

Talk:Nemo bis (edit)

937 bytes added , 12 March 2014

close, but not exactly.

331

edits

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 :::::Motives matter. Motives create patterns of behavior. Motives cherry-pick evidence. Motives selectively create articles. Unrecognized motives can wreck our lives and our communities. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 17:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 ::::::So, delete stuff if you think the motive was bad, rather than because the article itself meets certain criteria? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
+:::::::Close, but not exactly. By default, delete stuff that is part of a pattern of behavior motivated by harm or damage, allow review of such stuff if content is in line with site mission. You raise boundary issues, and attempt to propose absolute standards, usually on the line of Whatever I Want Is Allowed and You Can't Do Anything About It But Go Away.
+:::::::Wikipedia generally made a decision on this issue. Some administrators sometimes don't get it, but, by policy, edits of blocked/banned users can be reverted on sight, but any other editor may bring them back in. Articles created by such editors (after block/ban) may be speedy deleted. However, someone else may create a page with the same content, if the ''content'' meets standards. Here, the standards are not clear. You attempt to translate that to The Usual. I.e, Whatever I Want Is Allowed.... --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 19:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)