Bureaucrats, interwiki, staff, Administrators
2,182
edits
Category talk:Wiki Edit Mode: Difference between revisions
→current
m (removing moot section) |
|||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
:: No, they're not the same. I've proposed '''ApprovalRequired''' as a replacement for Restricted, Subscription, InvitationRequired, RequestLogin, Censored and Membership because it seems to be a category that encompasses all these others. The actual mechanism of that Approval isn't important to me. If there's another name for this concept, that's fine with me. I just want to group all of those into one. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:21, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | :: No, they're not the same. I've proposed '''ApprovalRequired''' as a replacement for Restricted, Subscription, InvitationRequired, RequestLogin, Censored and Membership because it seems to be a category that encompasses all these others. The actual mechanism of that Approval isn't important to me. If there's another name for this concept, that's fine with me. I just want to group all of those into one. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:21, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
I like the idea that if a human being is required to "grant access" then it falls into a single category, such as "ApprovalRequired". "InviteRequired" works just as well for me, as does "ByInvitation". So to the extent that a human is required for any wikis falling into "Subscription", "RequestLogin" or "Restrited", then these should be in this category. If we do that, I think we're down to something like 5 categories? That would be awesome. --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 21:39, 22 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
=== deleted === | === deleted === | ||
* ''KeyedAccess (0)'' '''deleted''' | * ''KeyedAccess (0)'' '''deleted''' | ||
* ''NewPagesOnly (0)'' '''deleted''' per Mark & Ted agreement | * ''NewPagesOnly (0)'' '''deleted''' per Mark & Ted agreement | ||