|
|
| (24 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==17-Feb-2006: Tag and category use==
| |
| * Tags would be used in the description field of the page, either inline or bulleted list
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| == 14-Feb-2006: Structured data ==
| |
| * What would the definition be for [[StructuredData]]
| |
|
| |
| == 13-Feb-2006: Authentic language categories ==
| |
| * see [[:Category:Spanish]] discussion for more info/example.
| |
|
| |
| == 29-Jan-2006: New categories production==
| |
| * We make the actual new cateogies after x time or x wiki fall into that category, pre-launch. [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
| |
| ** Additional Categories. I found that if you add an additional category to a page (see CodeBook and AddYourOwn) you must also add the category command somewhere on the page so that it also categorized the article properly. I am concerned that this will be confusing to users, so for now, I am using this format to at least keep it all in one place: --[[User:Rathbone|Ray]] 17:04, 19 Jan 2006 (EST)
| |
| *** Sure, that makes sense --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 20:49, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)
| |
| **** All this messy stuff can be moved to [[How do categories work]] and we can decide what to do. Is that the right place? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 13:04, 23 Jan 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == 28-Jan-2006: Coding comments for more transparent clarity==
| |
| * More transparent wiki conversation/work. We start to code our page work in the summary as much as possilbe, as to model transparent conversation on the recent changes page, for newbies, and really ourselves. I just think it will only help to do as much coding as possible :-) [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
| |
| ** I agree and will try to do this --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 20:49, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)
| |