A Storehouse of Knowledge: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(fix license after cat rename, update stats)
(Remove opinion already discussed on talk page.)
Line 27: Line 27:
Site founder Philip J Rayment criticises Conservapedia with this comment: "''However, it is not, and never will be, an encyclopaedia.  It gives Christians, creationists, and conservatives a bad name by operating in ways that do not match Christian and conservative values.  As long as it is like that (and it shows no signs of improving), I want it to fail.''" <small>''[http://web.aanet.com.au/P_Rayment/Conservapedia/Problems.htm (from his personal website)]''</small>
Site founder Philip J Rayment criticises Conservapedia with this comment: "''However, it is not, and never will be, an encyclopaedia.  It gives Christians, creationists, and conservatives a bad name by operating in ways that do not match Christian and conservative values.  As long as it is like that (and it shows no signs of improving), I want it to fail.''" <small>''[http://web.aanet.com.au/P_Rayment/Conservapedia/Problems.htm (from his personal website)]''</small>


Although the site owner claims aSK is an 'encyclopædia', it would seem that many articles do not include appropriate citations, references or footnotes for independent verification (though some articles do have citations, albeit citations biased towards the specific viewpoint).  Nonetheless, many articles are well-written, and clearly effort has been made on the presentational style and structure of the wiki, although the use of [http://astorehouseofknowledge.info/wiki/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&prefix=&namespace=6 images] in articles is in practice very limited.
Clear effort is made on the presentational style and structure of the wiki. Its use of [http://astorehouseofknowledge.info/wiki/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&prefix=&namespace=6 images] in articles is in practice very limited.


During 2012, the site saw an increase in spam, but managed to stop this by requiring new users to conform to a particular format with their usernames, which an administrator would then change to their selected name.  As of 2013, it is largely dormant, though to the extent any editing occurs, it remains dominated by the site creator.
During 2012, the site saw an increase in spam, but managed to stop this by requiring new users to conform to a particular format with their usernames, which an administrator would then change to their selected name.  As of 2013, it is largely dormant, though to the extent any editing occurs, it remains dominated by the site creator.

Revision as of 11:35, 20 December 2013

http://astorehouseofknowledge.info/skins/common/images/Dove_on_globe2.png A Storehouse of Knowledge
Recent changes
[No WikiNode]
About
[No Mobile URL]
Founded by:
Status: Dormant
Language: English
Edit mode: LoginToEdit
Wiki engine: MediaWiki
Wiki license: Proprietary license
Main topic: Bible
Wiki size: 2,085 article pages see stats
wikiFactor: 8 info / verify

(As of: 19 December 2013)


A Storehouse of Knowledge or aSK is a general encyclopædia with a point of view specifically toward a biblical worldview. It was founded by former Conservapedia sysop Philip J Rayment, an Australian evangelical Christian. It began on 22 March 2009.

Site founder Philip J Rayment criticises Conservapedia with this comment: "However, it is not, and never will be, an encyclopaedia. It gives Christians, creationists, and conservatives a bad name by operating in ways that do not match Christian and conservative values. As long as it is like that (and it shows no signs of improving), I want it to fail." (from his personal website)

Clear effort is made on the presentational style and structure of the wiki. Its use of images in articles is in practice very limited.

During 2012, the site saw an increase in spam, but managed to stop this by requiring new users to conform to a particular format with their usernames, which an administrator would then change to their selected name. As of 2013, it is largely dormant, though to the extent any editing occurs, it remains dominated by the site creator.