BoyWiki: Difference between revisions
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 175687 by Sophie Wilder (talk)) |
(Undid revision 175691 by Leucosticte (talk)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Wiki | {{Wiki | ||
|URL = | |URL = | ||
|logo = [[File:Boywiki-logo.png|125px]] | |logo = [[File:Boywiki-logo.png|125px]] | ||
|recentchanges URL = | |recentchanges URL = | ||
|wikinode URL = No | |wikinode URL = No | ||
|status = Dormant | |status = Dormant | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| statistics URL = http://en.boywiki.org/wiki/Special:Statistics <!--page count source (often a 'Statistics' page); if unknown type 'No'--> | | statistics URL = http://en.boywiki.org/wiki/Special:Statistics <!--page count source (often a 'Statistics' page); if unknown type 'No'--> | ||
| wikiFactor = 7 <!--preferred; if unknown leave void; see: Category:wikiFactor for help--> | | wikiFactor = 7 <!--preferred; if unknown leave void; see: Category:wikiFactor for help--> | ||
| wikiFactor URL = | | wikiFactor URL = <!--wF source (often 'PopularPages', 'Mostvisitedpages' or 'PageHits'); if unknown leave void--> | ||
}}(As of: 18 July 2013)<!--manually add/amend date when stats are verified and/or updated--> | }}(As of: 18 July 2013)<!--manually add/amend date when stats are verified and/or updated--> | ||
'''BoyWiki''' is a [[wiki]] associated with the " | '''BoyWiki''' is a [[wiki]] associated with the "Free Spirits" network that is devoted to discussion of pedophilia, which the site describes as "the strong feelings of attraction and affection that {{tag|adult}}s feel towards boys". The main page of the site notes, "en.boywiki is rebuilding from our extended offline period. Articles are being restored from the previous database. New user accounts can be opened but editing permissions are not automatic. BoyWiki also needs an administration team." Stub articles are called "fledglings" on this site. | ||
The original | The original proposal called for a hierarchy of a Keeper, Curators, and Scribes. A number of security measures were introduced, including only allowing the Curator team to add images, disabling all tracking or displaying of IP addresses, and enabling the complete expunging of problematic edits (a euphemism for content that could get the site in trouble with law enforcement). The site was deliberately put on a separate domain from the rest of Free Spirits in order to distance the wiki's collection of many different opinions and viewpoints from expressing any official endorsement of content by Free Spirits. | ||
As of 2012, the site appeared to have been mostly inactive since May 2009, although the site owners were responding to emails. By 2014, there was considerable activity, but mostly from a single user, Etenne. | As of 2012, the site appeared to have been mostly inactive since May 2009, although the site owners were responding to emails. By 2014, there was considerable activity, but mostly from a single user, Etenne. Etenne commented in a 13 December 2013 BoyChat post that BoyWiki is better than Wikipedia because BoyWiki lacks a child protection policy. BoyChat has been on the English Wikipedia's blacklist since 2010, when Fox News [http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2010/06/25/exclusive-pedophiles-find-home-on-wikipedia/ reported] there were a grand total of 12 external links to BoyChat. This number [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?page=MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist&oldid=378472679#Possible_pedophilia_related_links.3F was confirmed] by the Wikipedians; they [[Wikipedia:Project:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive214#fox_news_brings_on_the_pedophile_dramahz|also confirmed]] "All of the links appear in old talk archives or from project page discussions." In light of the outcome of [[wikipedia:Project:Articles for deletion/BoyChat]], they apparently felt there was no benefit to the encyclopedia of leaving the URL unblacklisted. | ||
[[Category:Wiki English]] | [[Category:Wiki English]] | ||
Revision as of 18:12, 5 March 2014
[  ]
|
[ BoyWiki] [ Recent changes] [No WikiNode] [No About] [No Mobile URL] |
|---|---|
| Founded by: | |
| Status: | Dormant |
| Language: | Multilingual |
| Edit mode: | ByInvitation |
| Wiki engine: | MediaWiki |
| Wiki license: | GNU Free Documentation License |
| Main topic: | People |
| Wiki size: | 880 article pages see stats |
| wikiFactor: | 7 |
(As of: 18 July 2013)
BoyWiki is a wiki associated with the "Free Spirits" network that is devoted to discussion of pedophilia, which the site describes as "the strong feelings of attraction and affection that adults feel towards boys". The main page of the site notes, "en.boywiki is rebuilding from our extended offline period. Articles are being restored from the previous database. New user accounts can be opened but editing permissions are not automatic. BoyWiki also needs an administration team." Stub articles are called "fledglings" on this site.
The original proposal called for a hierarchy of a Keeper, Curators, and Scribes. A number of security measures were introduced, including only allowing the Curator team to add images, disabling all tracking or displaying of IP addresses, and enabling the complete expunging of problematic edits (a euphemism for content that could get the site in trouble with law enforcement). The site was deliberately put on a separate domain from the rest of Free Spirits in order to distance the wiki's collection of many different opinions and viewpoints from expressing any official endorsement of content by Free Spirits.
As of 2012, the site appeared to have been mostly inactive since May 2009, although the site owners were responding to emails. By 2014, there was considerable activity, but mostly from a single user, Etenne. Etenne commented in a 13 December 2013 BoyChat post that BoyWiki is better than Wikipedia because BoyWiki lacks a child protection policy. BoyChat has been on the English Wikipedia's blacklist since 2010, when Fox News reported there were a grand total of 12 external links to BoyChat. This number was confirmed by the Wikipedians; they also confirmed "All of the links appear in old talk archives or from project page discussions." In light of the outcome of wikipedia:Project:Articles for deletion/BoyChat, they apparently felt there was no benefit to the encyclopedia of leaving the URL unblacklisted.