Talk:Research Psychologist: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (re) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:He has a very distinctive editing style. I don't know anyone else who uses HTML markup so extensively in his wikitext ''and'' has such a strong interest in eugenics. He's definitely a one-of-a-kind guy. Anyway, this isn't the first site to link the accounts; RationalWiki did the same. But whatever; if this site is only for authorized bios, then so be it. | :He has a very distinctive editing style. I don't know anyone else who uses HTML markup so extensively in his wikitext ''and'' has such a strong interest in eugenics. He's definitely a one-of-a-kind guy. Anyway, this isn't the first site to link the accounts; RationalWiki did the same. But whatever; if this site is only for authorized bios, then so be it. | ||
:How is it a private agenda? It's just information. People can do with it as they wish. He criticized me, but I didn't care. He was rather amusing and was a net positive to most wikis he participated in, especially [[ChildWiki]]. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 18:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | :How is it a private agenda? It's just information. People can do with it as they wish. He criticized me, but I didn't care. He was rather amusing and was a net positive to most wikis he participated in, especially [[ChildWiki]]. His fans and others who are interested in seeing what he wrote and how people responded to him may have an interest in the material. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 18:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:27, 10 March 2014
I have nominated the page for deletion because this user was active on wikis where the creator of the page had administrative privileges, the user strongly criticized the page creator here,[1] and this information may be private. This is not a major figure in the wiki world, and WikiIndex enters perilous territory if it becomes a collection of pages like this, in pursuit of a private agenda. --Abd (talk) 18:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- He has a very distinctive editing style. I don't know anyone else who uses HTML markup so extensively in his wikitext and has such a strong interest in eugenics. He's definitely a one-of-a-kind guy. Anyway, this isn't the first site to link the accounts; RationalWiki did the same. But whatever; if this site is only for authorized bios, then so be it.
- How is it a private agenda? It's just information. People can do with it as they wish. He criticized me, but I didn't care. He was rather amusing and was a net positive to most wikis he participated in, especially ChildWiki. His fans and others who are interested in seeing what he wrote and how people responded to him may have an interest in the material. Leucosticte (talk) 18:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)