1,756
edits
WikiIndex talk:Prohibited content: Difference between revisions
→Controversial sites
(→My views on what is prohibited content,: BoyWiki is live and Leucosticte does not represent it.) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
When disruptive users are allowed to disrupt, other users leave. If the wiki management doesn't care, well, it doesn't care about the future of the wiki. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 22:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | When disruptive users are allowed to disrupt, other users leave. If the wiki management doesn't care, well, it doesn't care about the future of the wiki. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 22:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:"Wikiversity is not, as a site, going to 'advocate legalization' of anything, but it may well ''cover'' such." That sounds more like a description of Wikibooks, which comes the closest of any Wikimedia project to having true academic freedom. I wasn't too impressed with the outcome of the discussion at [[wikiversity:Wikiversity talk:Ethics for pages concerning illegal or physically dangerous activities]] or with the sysop actions on that wiki that led to that debate, viz. the deletion of the suicide content. I also wasn't too impressed with Sidelight12's [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=Sidelight12&page=User%3ALeucosticte&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_thanks_log=1 blocks] that occurred in response to debate concerning the child protection policy, and [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=Sidelight12&page=Wikiversity+talk%3AChild+protection+policy&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_thanks_log=1 his revision deletions], the latter of which remain in effect. | |||
:It sounds like "wiki management" is active and on your side, although they may have taken awhile to arrive to the scene. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 04:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | |||