Talk:WikiWikiWeb: Difference between revisions

1,350 bytes added ,  27 January 2015
→‎What was Wards last edit in C2?: no providing of content
(Huh?)
(→‎What was Wards last edit in C2?: no providing of content)
Line 108: Line 108:
: As everyone can see who has eyes in his head, Ward reluctantly did a minimum-intervention on [http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?PatternsOfClaimsAgainstTop PatternsOfClaimsAgainstTop] which is a collection of accusations, mostly by anonymous, that shows that so called community saw themselves unable to deal with the contributions "from the sheriffs office" and therefore cried out for the help to the [[God-king]]. He refused to actively step in and expressed his desire not to be disturbed again within the next two years. Since he got disturbed again only two years later, he was fed up and locked down the wiki to ensure his peace. This again was only a maintenance note on account of external pressure. If he would not have responded at all, people would have called him irresponsible. But he did not take part in adding content. He even refused any active part in solving the "problem" of [http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?TopMind TopMind]. Without any serious technical issue forcing him or any big upheaval in his kindergarten he was no showing up again on the remains of his "historic" wiki-experiment. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 08:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
: As everyone can see who has eyes in his head, Ward reluctantly did a minimum-intervention on [http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?PatternsOfClaimsAgainstTop PatternsOfClaimsAgainstTop] which is a collection of accusations, mostly by anonymous, that shows that so called community saw themselves unable to deal with the contributions "from the sheriffs office" and therefore cried out for the help to the [[God-king]]. He refused to actively step in and expressed his desire not to be disturbed again within the next two years. Since he got disturbed again only two years later, he was fed up and locked down the wiki to ensure his peace. This again was only a maintenance note on account of external pressure. If he would not have responded at all, people would have called him irresponsible. But he did not take part in adding content. He even refused any active part in solving the "problem" of [http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?TopMind TopMind]. Without any serious technical issue forcing him or any big upheaval in his kindergarten he was no showing up again on the remains of his "historic" wiki-experiment. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 08:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


''Your assertion was that Ward's last edit was in 2005.  Clearly, it isn't.  The nature and content of the edit are irrelevant, and your comment only demonstrates your lack of understanding of the culture and mock-grumpy banter that is characteristic of the WikiWikiWeb.''
''Your assertion was that Ward's last edit was in 2005.  Clearly, it isn't.  The nature and content of the edit are irrelevant, and your comment only demonstrates your lack of understanding of the culture and mock-grumpy banter that is characteristic of the WikiWikiWeb.'' (Dave Voorhis, unsigned)
 
* The "mock-grumpy banter" is in no way a speciality of that wiki. I have seen this nearly everywhere in digital textual asynchronous communication in the last 25 years. Your assumption demonstrates a great lack of experience outside that wiki in general. Also it '''was''' characteristic if at all. There '''is''' no banter any more. The wiki is locked, the experiment is over. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 09:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 
* It is not Your call to rule what is irrelevant. The nature and content is relevant because Ward was the only one who had two or three roles: Creator, maintainer and contributor. Every one else was only contributor. No other person wrote the software or owned the domain or had the contract with the provider of. Therefore he was called God-king. Therefore the content and nature of his edits are to be distinguished and related to any of the roles. You should be extremely happy, that after silently dropping his role as a contributor he did not drop his role as a maintainer as well. Otherwise the wiki would have been locked like meatball since long or down like w²k. So You could play the one-eyed king and sharkmaster in the land of the blind ;-) [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 09:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


''You appear to be oddly obsessed with -- and very disparaging toward -- the WikiWikiWeb.  Why is that?''
''You appear to be oddly obsessed with -- and very disparaging toward -- the WikiWikiWeb.  Why is that?''
5,933

edits