5,933
edits
WikiIndex talk:Proposal: domain name change: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiIndex talk:Proposal: domain name change (edit)
Revision as of 03:30, 15 March 2015
, 15 March 2015→About the illusion of importance of WikiIndex
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
As usual You did not get it: The number of incoming links is so few, that there is no relevance of having them or not having them. If You would create a lemma for WikiIndex on en:wikipedia, that would be hundred of times more relevant and useful than a few hundred incoming links from unimportant sites. And You can not make a totally unimportant wiki more unimportant ;-) We are rock bottom regarding this. To forward any incoming traffic from wikiindex.org to newname.wiki is more than enough regarding those links. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 03:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC) | As usual You did not get it: The number of incoming links is so few, that there is no relevance of having them or not having them. If You would create a lemma for WikiIndex on en:wikipedia, that would be hundred of times more relevant and useful than a few hundred incoming links from unimportant sites. And You can not make a totally unimportant wiki more unimportant ;-) We are rock bottom regarding this. To forward any incoming traffic from wikiindex.org to newname.wiki is more than enough regarding those links. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 03:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
:'''Thanks''' As usual, ''you'' don't and are abusive and rude about it. If the site is small and has few links, then breaking them will only do a disservice. I think we all realize that there needs to be some method (possibly using HTTP, possibly by leaving the site at the original domain name, possibly something else) in order to retain what few links we have. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 03:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC) | :'''Thanks''' As usual, ''you'' don't and are abusive and rude about it. If the site is small and has few links, then breaking them will only do a disservice. I think we all realize that there needs to be some method (possibly using HTTP, possibly by leaving the site at the original domain name, possibly something else) in order to retain what few links we have. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 03:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
It is sooo pathetic to quarrel about 200 links! If we would not only continue to be "plodding on" for the next 8 years to come but start doing work with system, speed and competence, than we would, amongst other things ask all indexed wikis to set back-links. That would generate us thousands of incoming links within short time. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 03:30, 15 March 2015 (UTC) | |||