WikiIndex talk:File deletion policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (+offending content) |
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→Obscenety: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* I would omit the remark "This also applies to articles in the main namespace." because in this manner the policy definition about that would be made on the page about files. If there is a valid policy about articles than simply link there in the see-also manner. | * I would omit the remark "This also applies to articles in the main namespace." because in this manner the policy definition about that would be made on the page about files. If there is a valid policy about articles than simply link there in the see-also manner. | ||
[[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 13:17, 10 August 2015 (PDT) | [[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 13:17, 10 August 2015 (PDT) | ||
== Obscenety == | |||
The depiction of nudity is in itself not obscene, otherwise the human being would be obscene it itself. | |||
[[wp:Boxer at Rest]] | |||
--[[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 01:45, 11 August 2015 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:45, 11 August 2015
- Usually sites have a policy to delete or moderate content that is offending like the undue display of violence, hatred or pornography. I think such a reason should be added.
- I would omit the remark "This also applies to articles in the main namespace." because in this manner the policy definition about that would be made on the page about files. If there is a valid policy about articles than simply link there in the see-also manner.
Manorainjan 13:17, 10 August 2015 (PDT)
Obscenety
The depiction of nudity is in itself not obscene, otherwise the human being would be obscene it itself. wp:Boxer at Rest --Manorainjan 01:45, 11 August 2015 (PDT)