Talk:Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(revert war? just kidding)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Why [[Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki]] rather than [[StargateWiki]]?
Why [[Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki]] rather than StargateWiki?


Because the page itself has a huge Welcome to Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki and that seems to match the url better than StargateWiki.  Feel free to show me another way.  [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:15, 3 Mar 2006 (EST)
:Because the page itself has a huge Welcome to Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki and that seems to match the url better than StargateWiki.  Feel free to show me another way.  [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:15, 3 Mar 2006 (EST)


Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing.  But so is [[Image:StargateWikiMainPage.png]]] for me. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small>
::Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing.  But so is [[Image:StargateWikiMainPage.png]]] for me. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small>


I have a great idea: Let's have a revert war! :-)  Just kidding.  We ought to have a guideline for how naming decisions get made.  Our [[Naming Conventions]] page is a bit weak at the moment. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 02:05, 4 Mar 2006 (EST)
:::I have a great idea: Let's have a revert war! :-)  Just kidding.  We ought to have a guideline for how naming decisions get made.  Our [[WikiIndex:Naming conventions]] page is a bit weak at the moment. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 02:05, 4 Mar 2006 (EST)