Talk:Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(revert war? just kidding) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why [[Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki]] rather than | Why [[Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki]] rather than StargateWiki? | ||
Because the page itself has a huge Welcome to Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki and that seems to match the url better than StargateWiki. Feel free to show me another way. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:15, 3 Mar 2006 (EST) | :Because the page itself has a huge Welcome to Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki and that seems to match the url better than StargateWiki. Feel free to show me another way. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:15, 3 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing. But so is [[Image:StargateWikiMainPage.png]]] for me. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | ::Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing. But so is [[Image:StargateWikiMainPage.png]]] for me. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | ||
I have a great idea: Let's have a revert war! :-) Just kidding. We ought to have a guideline for how naming decisions get made. Our [[Naming | :::I have a great idea: Let's have a revert war! :-) Just kidding. We ought to have a guideline for how naming decisions get made. Our [[WikiIndex:Naming conventions]] page is a bit weak at the moment. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 02:05, 4 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:02, 18 July 2022
Why Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki rather than StargateWiki?
- Because the page itself has a huge Welcome to Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki and that seems to match the url better than StargateWiki. Feel free to show me another way. TedErnst | talk 17:15, 3 Mar 2006 (EST)
- Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing. But so is
] for me. MarkDilley | talk
- Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing. But so is
- I have a great idea: Let's have a revert war! :-) Just kidding. We ought to have a guideline for how naming decisions get made. Our WikiIndex:Naming conventions page is a bit weak at the moment. TedErnst | talk 02:05, 4 Mar 2006 (EST)