Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
Template talk:Newest additions: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "{{TOCright}}" to "{{TOC right}}"
(→cannot edit template ??: it's ok now) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "{{TOCright}}" to "{{TOC right}}") |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOC right}} | |||
50% for each column - why is this needed? The reason I eliminated it was because different browsers display things in different ways. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:35, 15 June 2006 (EDT) | 50% for each column - why is this needed? The reason I eliminated it was because different browsers display things in different ways. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:35, 15 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
== bullet, date, item == | ==bullet, date, item== | ||
I have no problem with bullet, date, item format. When It's bullet, date, item and then next line is indented bullet, item it starts to look funny to me. That's why I made the date line without the bullet. Unfortunately, that doesn't play nice with lines that are bullet, date, item. Maybe indented bullet is the answer? | I have no problem with bullet, date, item format. When It's bullet, date, item and then next line is indented bullet, item it starts to look funny to me. That's why I made the date line without the bullet. Unfortunately, that doesn't play nice with lines that are bullet, date, item. Maybe indented bullet is the answer? | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:39, 15 June 2006 (EDT) | [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:39, 15 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
== too complicated == | ==too complicated== | ||
I think it is a valiant effort, idea and implementation, but when I click add yourself, all I see is code, and I would rather it be a single plain list. [[MarkDilley]] | I think it is a valiant effort, idea and implementation, but when I click add yourself, all I see is code, and I would rather it be a single plain list. [[MarkDilley]] | ||
: Would you like me to move it back to the simplest possible template? If so, what would you like [[Welcome]] to look like. I'm happy to fix this since I broke it, if you like. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 22:37, 16 June 2006 (EDT) | :Would you like me to move it back to the simplest possible template? If so, what would you like [[Welcome]] to look like. I'm happy to fix this since I broke it, if you like. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 22:37, 16 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
==cannot edit template ??== | |||
I got the followinf message, when I wanted to save my changes (cut older news etc.): | I got the followinf message, when I wanted to save my changes (cut older news etc.): | ||
Spam protection filter | Spam protection filter | ||
| Line 37: | Line 35: | ||
Return to Welcome. | Return to Welcome. | ||
What can I do? --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:42, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | What can I do? --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:42, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
: I found a solution by myself, thank you for attention --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:48, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | :I found a solution by myself, thank you for attention --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:48, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
==how many items should be listed== | |||
Sometimes I clen up, how many should I leave? 50 Items? --[[Special:Contributions/87.160.184.123|87.160.184.123]] 16:33, 9 October 2007 (EDT) (Wolf) BTW, has anyone a clue why I seem to be not logged in, when I edit this template? --[[User:Peu|Wolf]] | |||
:oh, seems to be my browser (FF2) --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:34, 9 October 2007 (EDT) | |||
''There's no set number. Just leave it looking in balance on the front page. Older items can be moved to the archive page, which keeps everything. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 10:57, 10 October 2007 (EDT) | |||
::where is this archive located? --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 12:19, 10 October 2007 (EDT) | |||
''[[WikiIndex:Newest additions archive]] - [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:35, 10 October 2007 (EDT)'' | |||
The template has a second row now. Should I go fix this? [[User:Swordman|Swordman]] 17:19, 23 July 2011 (PDT) | |||
Never mind. I archived both the January and February entries.[[User:Swordman|Swordman]] 17:45, 23 July 2011 (PDT) | |||
==Automated or not at all== | |||
What a name: Recent visitors ? | |||
*The name got nothing to do with what is going on. The only thing not mentioned in the table is the visitor. | |||
*It is about new wiki entries in the Main space. So the name should be something like: "newest additions to the WikiIndex" | |||
*Why do our "visitors" have to fill this form? (and don't even get mentioned) Is it not possible to create those entries automatically every time a new wiki page is crated by using the template? | |||
*Shall we really kill the time of our valued "visitors" an our own time for that? | |||
--[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 00:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||