Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
(we liked to opt in :-)) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (Fix red link following category rename) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOC right}} | |||
==WikiIndex?== | |||
Hi Mark, we (sander, daniel and me) discussed it and decided that you are right. It is a good idea to have a [[WikiIndex]] and we would like to part of it. We had some [[spam]] problems, but finally realised that numbers of [[user]]s equals findability equals amount of spam. If nobody can find us, nobody can spam us, but also nobody will use our wiki. We are then like the little kid in a [[:Category:Netherlands|Dutch]] commercial that send all his friends home so that he can eat the birthdaycake by himself, fat and lonely :-). | |||
Anyways, it would work even better when everybody that is linked by WikiIndex links to WikiIndex. That way we would influence [[:Category:Google|google]] search results (we get linked by you and your link to us get's more weight because we (and everybody else) links to you). It would be nice when you provide a button (maybe with wiki-markup, like websites do with html markup): | |||
http://wikimaas.org/upload/WikiIndex.png | |||
And maybe you should consider getting WikiIndex.org. it's more usual for wiki's to have org. I think. Thanks anyways for your great idea of creating order in the wiki-chaos and thanks for having us. --[[Special:Contributions/137.120.5.182|137.120.5.182]] 10:01, 11 July 2006 (EDT) | |||
--[[ | |||
edits