User talk:Mcb1209: Difference between revisions
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→Archived: new section) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Wiki Status" to "Wiki status") |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Welcome}} [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 20:39, 25 August 2015 (PDT) | |||
==WikiFree== | |||
| | Are there any [[:Category:WikiFree|Wikifree]] wikis by now? [[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 02:45, 28 August 2015 (PDT) | ||
==Archived== | |||
In case of "[[:Category:Dead|Dead]]" wikis that got pages [[:Category:Archived|archived]] like in [[Archive.org]], we do not mark them as Dead but as Archived and replace the dead link with a useful one from archive.org. --[[User talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 15:48, 24 January 2016 (PST) | |||
:Thanks, I didn't know. --[[User:Mcb1209|Mcb1209]] ([[User talk:Mcb1209|talk]]) 15:56, 24 January 2016 (PST) | |||
== | ==[[Rules of the Internet]]== | ||
*Why do You think it is not a wiki? | |||
*If You think, it is not a wiki, why do You list it on WikiIndex? | |||
--[[User talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 14:13, 9 May 2016 (PDT) | |||
When I used Internet Archive, I used the snapshot from 2008 that used MediaWiki and one snapshot said [[Archive.org:20081201071652/http://www.rulesoftheinternet.com/index.php5?title=Main_Page|stop editing the wiki with crap]], I guess they call it a wiki at the time until 2012 I guess. | |||
:I think it was a wiki and still is one. It may be a silly one, useless, a one-man-show but still a wiki. | |||
*How do You know it "Needs love"? (depreciated status) | |||
[[User talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 14:38, 9 May 2016 (PDT) | |||
I changed it to [[:Category:Dormant|dormant]], by the way, should we get rid of [[:Category:Needs love|Needs love]]? --[[User:Mcb1209|Mcb1209]] ([[User talk:Mcb1209|talk]]) 15:30, 9 May 2016 (PDT) | |||
:I also think Dormant is the best choice by now. I suggested the elimination of Needs love 1 1/2 year ago. The discussion was not finalised, as usual. [[Category talk:Wiki status]] You may reopen it. The question is a bit more complex than just getting rid of a depreciated status. [[User talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 15:59, 9 May 2016 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:15, 10 January 2023
Hello, Mcb1209 — Welcome to WikiIndex :-) |
WikiIndex aims to build bridges between wiki communities. We hope that you will enjoy browsing and editing this wiki.
Our goal is to make an index of all wiki sites. We appreciate your help in our ongoing quest.
Your contributions and your ideas are greatly valued. Thank you! |
Koavf (talk) 20:39, 25 August 2015 (PDT)
WikiFree[edit]
Are there any Wikifree wikis by now? Manorainjan 02:45, 28 August 2015 (PDT)
Archived[edit]
In case of "Dead" wikis that got pages archived like in Archive.org, we do not mark them as Dead but as Archived and replace the dead link with a useful one from archive.org. --Manorainjan 15:48, 24 January 2016 (PST)
Rules of the Internet[edit]
- Why do You think it is not a wiki?
- If You think, it is not a wiki, why do You list it on WikiIndex?
--Manorainjan 14:13, 9 May 2016 (PDT)
When I used Internet Archive, I used the snapshot from 2008 that used MediaWiki and one snapshot said stop editing the wiki with crap, I guess they call it a wiki at the time until 2012 I guess.
- I think it was a wiki and still is one. It may be a silly one, useless, a one-man-show but still a wiki.
- How do You know it "Needs love"? (depreciated status)
Manorainjan 14:38, 9 May 2016 (PDT)
I changed it to dormant, by the way, should we get rid of Needs love? --Mcb1209 (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2016 (PDT)
- I also think Dormant is the best choice by now. I suggested the elimination of Needs love 1 1/2 year ago. The discussion was not finalised, as usual. Category talk:Wiki status You may reopen it. The question is a bit more complex than just getting rid of a depreciated status. Manorainjan 15:59, 9 May 2016 (PDT)