User talk:Comets: Difference between revisions

1,241 bytes added ,  22 January 2023
(→‎Re:Edit summary: new section)
(Fix redirects, fix red links)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TOCright}}
{{TOC right}}
==Who's Online? ==
==Who's Online?==
'''Users Online''': <whosonline></whosonline>
{|class=wikitable
*Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}
!Stats!!last 16 [[Special:WhosOnline|Page Views by LoggedIn Users]]
|-
|You are logged in as:<br>
'''{{CURRENTUSER}}'''
*Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}  
*Pages = {{NUMBEROFPAGES}}
*Pages = {{NUMBEROFPAGES}}
*Users = {{NUMBEROFUSERS}}
*Users = {{NUMBEROFUSERS}}
*Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}}
*Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}}
*Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}}
*Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}}
*Current User = {{CURRENTUSER}}
||{{:Special:WhosOnline/16}}
|}


Hello and thanks for the tip!  I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-)  Glad you are here.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
Hello and thanks for the tip!  I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-)  Glad you are here.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
Line 15: Line 20:
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!


We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki]], and [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war|The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]].  As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia.  As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia.  As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website.  Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki (en)]], and [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war|The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]].  As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia.  As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia.  As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website.  Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)


==block length==
==block length==
Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this [[WikiIndex]] a better place.  I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at [[WikiIndex:Blocking Policy]] ?  --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this [[WikiIndex]] a better place.  I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at [[WikiIndex:Blocking and banning policy]] ?  --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)


==Dispute resolution==
==Dispute resolution==
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThis_is_not_the_solution&diff=69572&oldid=69536 here] ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is [https://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThis_is_not_the_solution&diff=69572&oldid=69536 here] ~~ [[MarkDilley]]


==About that "dispute resolution"...==
==About that "dispute resolution"...==
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):
 
*[[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Vote for re-insertion]]
[[Talk:RationalWiki#Vote for re-insertion]]
*[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]]
 
*[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]]
[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]]
*[[Talk:Liberapedia (Wikia)#Vote for re-insertion]]
 
[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]]
 
[[Talk:Liberapedia#Vote for re-insertion]]


==Hi Comets,==
==Hi Comets,==
Line 42: Line 43:


==Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all==
==Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all==
Please check out [[WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]]
Please check out [[WikiIndex:New logo decision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]]


==Yes I'm all thumbs==
==Yes I'm all thumbs==
Line 50: Line 51:
It was less than a minute. Just checking in.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
It was less than a minute. Just checking in.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]


== Re:Edit summary ==
==narrowing down the problem with email verification==
I (Manorainjan ;-) assume, that Your account is email-verified. Please add the domain part of Your email to this [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki#Table of results|Table of results]] so that we can see more clearly, which servers work and which not.


Did not know that. Will make sure to do that in the future.
==Request for [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] concerns ==
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to the upcoming [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] and solicit your help in making the transition a positive rather than negative experience.  Please take a moment to visit [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] and curate the list of concerns. Thanks! -- [[User:BrandonCsSanders|BrandonCsSanders]] ([[User talk:BrandonCsSanders|talk]]) 22:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC) (call forwarded by [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 23:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC))


[[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 04:25, 29 May 2013 (PDT)Arcane
==Weigh in on [[WikiIndex:Proposal: domain name change#Poll]]?==
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to a potential [[WikiIndex:Proposal: domain name change|decision to change the domain of this wiki]].  I hope you'll weigh in with your opinion.  Thanks! [[User:BrandonCsSanders|BrandonCsSanders]] ([[User talk:BrandonCsSanders|talk]]) 20:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)