Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
User talk:Comets: Difference between revisions
Fix redirects, fix red links
(Welcome) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) |
||
| (31 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOC right}} | |||
==Who's Online?== | |||
{|class=wikitable | |||
!Stats!!last 16 [[Special:WhosOnline|Page Views by LoggedIn Users]] | |||
|- | |||
|You are logged in as:<br> | |||
'''{{CURRENTUSER}}''' | |||
*Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} | |||
*Pages = {{NUMBEROFPAGES}} | |||
*Users = {{NUMBEROFUSERS}} | |||
*Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}} | |||
*Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}} | |||
||{{:Special:WhosOnline/16}} | |||
|} | |||
Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:Np :) ..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT) | |||
==Request for neutral admin== | |||
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win! | |||
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki (en)]], and [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war|The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST) | |||
==block length== | |||
Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this [[WikiIndex]] a better place. I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at [[WikiIndex:Blocking and banning policy]] ? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | |||
==Dispute resolution== | |||
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is [https://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThis_is_not_the_solution&diff=69572&oldid=69536 here] ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | |||
==About that "dispute resolution"...== | |||
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages): | |||
*[[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
*[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
*[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
*[[Talk:Liberapedia (Wikia)#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
==Hi Comets,== | |||
I recreated ;-) the page [[Christopedia]] in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and <code>{{Template|add}}</code>. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST) | |||
:oh OK, its better than what was previously :P ..haha :)..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 21:31, 11 November 2009 (EST) | |||
==Your thoughts on upgrade and logo== | |||
Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - [[WikiIndex:Admin Notes#October 2010 Upgrade Thoughts]] - best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
==Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all== | |||
Please check out [[WikiIndex:New logo decision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
==Yes I'm all thumbs== | |||
I think I'll just stop for a while to be honest. Sorry again [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] 07:30, 27 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
==Why so rough?== | |||
It was less than a minute. Just checking in. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
==narrowing down the problem with email verification== | |||
I (Manorainjan ;-) assume, that Your account is email-verified. Please add the domain part of Your email to this [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki#Table of results|Table of results]] so that we can see more clearly, which servers work and which not. | |||
==Request for [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] concerns == | |||
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to the upcoming [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] and solicit your help in making the transition a positive rather than negative experience. Please take a moment to visit [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] and curate the list of concerns. Thanks! -- [[User:BrandonCsSanders|BrandonCsSanders]] ([[User talk:BrandonCsSanders|talk]]) 22:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC) (call forwarded by [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 23:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)) | |||
==Weigh in on [[WikiIndex:Proposal: domain name change#Poll]]?== | |||
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to a potential [[WikiIndex:Proposal: domain name change|decision to change the domain of this wiki]]. I hope you'll weigh in with your opinion. Thanks! [[User:BrandonCsSanders|BrandonCsSanders]] ([[User talk:BrandonCsSanders|talk]]) 20:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC) | |||