User talk:Comets: Difference between revisions

1,662 bytes added ,  22 January 2023
(Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all)
(Fix redirects, fix red links)
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Who's Online? ==
{{TOC right}}
<b>Users Online</b>: <whosonline></whosonline>
==Who's Online?==
 
{|class=wikitable
* Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}
!Stats!!last 16 [[Special:WhosOnline|Page Views by LoggedIn Users]]
* Pages = {{NUMBEROFPAGES}}
|-
* Users = {{NUMBEROFUSERS}}
|You are logged in as:<br>
* Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}}
'''{{CURRENTUSER}}'''
* Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}}
*Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}  
* Current User = {{CURRENTUSER}}
*Pages = {{NUMBEROFPAGES}}
*Users = {{NUMBEROFUSERS}}
*Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}}
*Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}}
||{{:Special:WhosOnline/16}}
|}


Hello and thanks for the tip!  I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-)  Glad you are here.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
Hello and thanks for the tip!  I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-)  Glad you are here.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
:Np :) ..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
:Np :) ..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT)


== Request for neutral admin ==
==Request for neutral admin==
 
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!


We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki]], and [[ The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website.
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki (en)]], and [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war|The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)


Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)
==block length==
Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this [[WikiIndex]] a better place.  I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at [[WikiIndex:Blocking and banning policy]] ?  --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)


== block length ==
==Dispute resolution==
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is [https://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThis_is_not_the_solution&diff=69572&oldid=69536 here] ~~ [[MarkDilley]]


Dear Comets,
==About that "dispute resolution"...==
thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this WikiIndex a better place.
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):
*[[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Vote for re-insertion]]
*[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]]
*[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]]
*[[Talk:Liberapedia (Wikia)#Vote for re-insertion]]


I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at [[WikiIndex:Blocking Policy]] ?
==Hi Comets,==
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
I recreated ;-) the page [[Christopedia]] in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and <code>{{Template|add}}</code>. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST)
 
:oh OK, its better than what was previously :P ..haha :)..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 21:31, 11 November 2009 (EST)
== Dispute resolution ==
 
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThis_is_not_the_solution&diff=69572&oldid=69536 here] ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
 
== About that "dispute resolution"... ==
 
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 sysops to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):
 
[[Talk:RationalWiki#Vote_for_re-insertion]]
 
[[Talk:A_Storehouse_of_Knowledge#Vote_for_re-insertion]]
 
[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote_for_re-insertion]]


[[Talk:Liberapedia#Vote_for_re-insertion]]
==Your thoughts on upgrade and logo==
Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - [[WikiIndex:Admin Notes#October 2010 Upgrade Thoughts]] - best, [[MarkDilley]]


== Hi Comets, ==
==Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all==
 
Please check out [[WikiIndex:New logo decision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]]
I recreated ;-) the page [[Christopedia]] in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and <code>{{Template|add}}</code>. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST)


oh OK, its better than what was previously :P ..haha :)..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 21:31, 11 November 2009 (EST)
==Yes I'm all thumbs==
I think I'll just stop for a while to be honest. Sorry again [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] 07:30, 27 April 2011 (PDT)


== Your thoughts on upgrade and logo ==
==Why so rough?==
It was less than a minute. Just checking in.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]


Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - [[WikiIndex:Admin_Notes#October_2010_Upgrade_Thoughts]] - best, [[MarkDilley]]
==narrowing down the problem with email verification==
I (Manorainjan ;-) assume, that Your account is email-verified. Please add the domain part of Your email to this [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki#Table of results|Table of results]] so that we can see more clearly, which servers work and which not.


== Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all ==
==Request for [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] concerns ==
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to the upcoming [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] and solicit your help in making the transition a positive rather than negative experience.  Please take a moment to visit [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] and curate the list of concerns.  Thanks! -- [[User:BrandonCsSanders|BrandonCsSanders]] ([[User talk:BrandonCsSanders|talk]]) 22:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC) (call forwarded by [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 23:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC))


Please check out [[WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]]
==Weigh in on [[WikiIndex:Proposal: domain name change#Poll]]?==
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to a potential [[WikiIndex:Proposal: domain name change|decision to change the domain of this wiki]].  I hope you'll weigh in with your opinion.  Thanks! [[User:BrandonCsSanders|BrandonCsSanders]] ([[User talk:BrandonCsSanders|talk]]) 20:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)