Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Blocking Policy" to "Blocking and banning policy") |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Fix red link) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
::: ''maybe no one cares what ''you'' want''? Did you really intend to sound this rude? | ::: ''maybe no one cares what ''you'' want''? Did you really intend to sound this rude? | ||
::: ''what ''you'' want the policy of WI to be''? Are you reading the same page I'm reading? From reading this page, phrases like "... standards should be established ..." and "Please keep in mind that these "policies" may change" make it sound like the writer is not trying to push through any particular policy. Rather, it sounds like that writer is curious as to our actual policies, and is pointing out various areas where a clear written policy might be a good idea. | ::: ''what ''you'' want the policy of WI to be''? Are you reading the same page I'm reading? From reading this page, phrases like "... standards should be established ..." and "Please keep in mind that these "policies" may change" make it sound like the writer is not trying to push through any particular policy. Rather, it sounds like that writer is curious as to our actual policies, and is pointing out various areas where a clear written policy might be a good idea. | ||
::: ''a disaster. A mess.'' This is a wiki. Therefore, if you see a disaster, please fix it. If a page is unfixable, slap that {{ | ::: ''a disaster. A mess.'' This is a wiki. Therefore, if you see a disaster, please fix it. If a page is unfixable, slap that {{Template|delete}} template at the top. With respect, --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 02:35, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::Hi David, "Many editors here came from wiki that didn't have a talk page" - but those of us who have editing wikis that have discussion (talk) pages for years have no way of knowing that. It's like that "real name goes in the mainspace" thing - had I known that I would have simply used a common pseudonym I employ when I signed up. | ::::Hi David, "Many editors here came from wiki that didn't have a talk page" - but those of us who have editing wikis that have discussion (talk) pages for years have no way of knowing that. It's like that "real name goes in the mainspace" thing - had I known that I would have simply used a common pseudonym I employ when I signed up. | ||
::::"maybe no one cares what ''you'' want" I'm looking for where I said that, was it the edit comment? Yeah, sorry, that Lummykin guy gets on my tits with his often incomprehensible approach. | ::::"maybe no one cares what ''you'' want" I'm looking for where I said that, was it the edit comment? Yeah, sorry, that Lummykin guy gets on my tits with his often incomprehensible approach. | ||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
==Previous contents were moved== | ==Previous contents were moved== | ||
The above discussion is relevant to the content of the project page before Dilley "seconded" Bob suggestion of replacing the page with a sentence. It was very long and many prolific editors and administrators commented on it. Dilley has asked that I slow down, but I may be permitted to develop the page further. It can now be found at [[User:Lumenos/WikiIndex | The above discussion is relevant to the content of the project page before Dilley "seconded" Bob suggestion of replacing the page with a sentence. It was very long and many prolific editors and administrators commented on it. Dilley has asked that I slow down, but I may be permitted to develop the page further. It can now be found at [[User:Lumenos/WikiIndex (unwritten) policies]] ~~ [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:03, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:While I am flattered that my comments now grace the project page, it is possible that a little more consideration might have been in order before they were unilaterally imposed.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 14:05, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | :While I am flattered that my comments now grace the project page, it is possible that a little more consideration might have been in order before they were unilaterally imposed.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 14:05, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Well, is it better than before? I don't aim for perfection, only improvement. I plan to merge in administrative comments from the original. I'm not really sure what you or Dilley want, but feel free to revert, merge, or do whatever. Any "unilateral" edit in a wiki is subject to peer review and alteration. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 16:03, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ::Well, is it better than before? I don't aim for perfection, only improvement. I plan to merge in administrative comments from the original. I'm not really sure what you or Dilley want, but feel free to revert, merge, or do whatever. Any "unilateral" edit in a wiki is subject to peer review and alteration. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 16:03, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
edits