User talk:Koavf/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "Wiki People" to "Wiki people"
(Template:TalkPageArchive, Template:TOCright, remove overwhelming plethora of unnecessary red links, rv xs whitespace, add x-axis sroll bar to fixed pitch boilerplate-type text, additional useful wikilinks)
m (Text replacement - "Wiki People" to "Wiki people")
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TalkPageArchive}}{{TOCright}}
{{TalkPageArchive}}{{TOC right}}
==Welcome==
==Welcome==
welcome! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:44, 7 August 2006 (EDT)
welcome! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:44, 7 August 2006 (EDT)
Line 12: Line 12:


==message re: upgrade path & moves==
==message re: upgrade path & moves==
Hello, please check out [[WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]]. Also, I am moving some of your move edits back to the main namespace - a couple of them are [[:Category:WikiIdea|WikiIdeas]] and I think fit with what [[WikiIndex]] was envisioned. Not a steadfast rule, please discuss if you would like.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
Hello, please check out [[WikiIndex:New logo decision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]]. Also, I am moving some of your move edits back to the main namespace - a couple of them are [[:Category:Wiki idea|wiki ideas]] and I think fit with what [[WikiIndex]] was envisioned. Not a steadfast rule, please discuss if you would like.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]


==Congratulations==
==Congratulations==
Line 42: Line 42:


==Notability of users==
==Notability of users==
"Are we going to make a page about every wiki user or just someone who has some notability...?" [[:Category:Wiki People]] says "this is a list of people who consider themselves to be part of the wiki community and their associations to various Wiki sites". I would say that [[PeterKa]] probably considers himself part of the wiki community. Shall we change that page to say "this is a list of ''notable'' people . . ."?
"Are we going to make a page about every wiki user or just someone who has some notability...?" [[:Category:Wiki people]] says "this is a list of people who consider themselves to be part of the wiki community and their associations to various Wiki sites". I would say that [[PeterKa]] probably considers himself part of the wiki community. Shall we change that page to say "this is a list of ''notable'' people . . ."?


Either way, another question is, are we going to actually make use of [[Template:Delete]] and invite discussion, or just have [[sysop]]s delete pages summarily? Pages deleted in that manner can be undeleted, but then we have the classic problem that non-sysops are unable to view the page and therefore cannot give very well-informed input about whether undeletion would be a good idea. If we are going to use the template, then sysops will need to periodically close those discussions; that didn't happen with the last round of deletion proposals. They sat there for weeks, so I closed them myself as "keep" or "no consensus" since there was in fact no consensus to delete (hardly anyone saw fit to weigh in on those talk pages). [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Either way, another question is, are we going to actually make use of [[Template:Delete]] and invite discussion, or just have [[sysop]]s delete pages summarily? Pages deleted in that manner can be undeleted, but then we have the classic problem that non-sysops are unable to view the page and therefore cannot give very well-informed input about whether undeletion would be a good idea. If we are going to use the template, then sysops will need to periodically close those discussions; that didn't happen with the last round of deletion proposals. They sat there for weeks, so I closed them myself as "keep" or "no consensus" since there was in fact no consensus to delete (hardly anyone saw fit to weigh in on those talk pages). [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Line 76: Line 76:
:: OK, I added [[:Category:Business]]. --[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 00:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
:: OK, I added [[:Category:Business]]. --[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 00:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


==[[:Category:Wiki Status]]==
==[[:Category:Wiki status]]==
I was wondering how to find the entries which do not have any category. I saw that there are explicit markers like [Category:UnknownStatus] and [Category:YourWikiStatus] which essentially means the same. But this markers need to be set first. What if no marker is set at all, if in the template You find '|status          = ' or not even this line? How to find such entries? --[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 21:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I was wondering how to find the entries which do not have any category. I saw that there are explicit markers like [Category:Unknown status] and [Category:YourWikiStatus] which essentially means the same. But this markers need to be set first. What if no marker is set at all, if in the template You find '|status          = ' or not even this line? How to find such entries? --[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 21:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)


:The most prolific way is when articles are tagged with [[template:Add]] (I think that dumps them into [[:Category:Wikis to add]]) – as these were generally how they were listed when the wiki was in its infancy.  Another way is in [[:Category:Stubs]].  HTH  [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]] / [[WikiIndex:Bureaucrats|'Crat]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 22:17, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
:The most prolific way is when articles are tagged with [[template:Add]] (I think that dumps them into [[:Category:Wikis to add]]) – as these were generally how they were listed when the wiki was in its infancy.  Another way is in [[:Category:Stubs]].  HTH  [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]] / [[WikiIndex:Bureaucrats|'Crat]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 22:17, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Line 87: Line 87:
::: I knew that. What I'm looking for is template-related and most likely not yet existing.--[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 16:39, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
::: I knew that. What I'm looking for is template-related and most likely not yet existing.--[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 16:39, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


==[[:Category:Wiki License]]==
==[[:Category:Wiki license]]==
What about a category 'unknown'? (actually in each of the chapters of the template). Simply that word so one always knows, what to enter when one does not know. --[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 16:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
What about a category 'unknown'? (actually in each of the chapters of the template). Simply that word so one always knows, what to enter when one does not know. --[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 16:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
:'''Excellent idea''' There could be one that's a maintenance category for no license mentioned and another for no license listed by the site. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 03:17, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
:'''Excellent idea''' There could be one that's a maintenance category for no license mentioned and another for no license listed by the site. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 03:17, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Line 128: Line 128:


==[[MeatballWiki]]==
==[[MeatballWiki]]==
You once edited it as [[:Category:Locked|Locked]]. Do You know any details about that? I changed it to [[:Category:Dormant|Dormant]] / [[:Category:ReadOnly|ReadOnly]], because the [[:Category:Wiki Edit Mode|Edit mode]] was [[:Category:OpenEdit|OpenEdit]] and Locked is an EditMode basically but no status of any catagory. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 00:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
You once edited it as [[:Category:Locked|Locked]]. Do You know any details about that? I changed it to [[:Category:Dormant|Dormant]] / [[:Category:Read-only|Read-only]], because the [[:Category:Wiki Edit Mode|Edit mode]] was [[:Category:OpenEdit|OpenEdit]] and Locked is an EditMode basically but no status of any catagory. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 00:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


:'''Locking''' I actually recently e-mailed [[Sunir Shah]] about this and he said that there was a [[spam]] problem that he couldn't resolve, so he just locked the site to stop it. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 01:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
:'''Locking''' I actually recently e-mailed [[Sunir Shah]] about this and he said that there was a [[spam]] problem that he couldn't resolve, so he just locked the site to stop it. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 01:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Line 138: Line 138:
:'''Status''' Some wikis are dormant simply because no one cares, some are dormant because they are locked from editing. That's a meaningful distinction to me. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 02:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
:'''Status''' Some wikis are dormant simply because no one cares, some are dormant because they are locked from editing. That's a meaningful distinction to me. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 02:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


Sure it is. But it is called Status and not Reason4Status. Just Like [[:Category:NeedsLove|NeedsLove]] which is not a status but an opinion, it does not belong in Status. Specifics can always be edited into the description. Otherwise we would blow up the Category:Status with numerous special stati. I could invent meaningful new stati by the minute. There is always a reason and it always makes a difference. Shall I? [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]])
Sure it is. But it is called Status and not Reason4Status. Just Like [[:Category:Needs love|Needs love]] which is not a status but an opinion, it does not belong in Status. Specifics can always be edited into the description. Otherwise we would blow up the Category:Status with numerous special stati. I could invent meaningful new stati by the minute. There is always a reason and it always makes a difference. Shall I? [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]])


:'''Reasons''' Statuses exist just as helpful guides. If you can think of more categories that would be useful, that's fine. If a community stops editing because it peters out, that's one thing--someone else can come along and begin editing. If a community stops editing because of a technical restriction, that's quite another. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 03:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
:'''Reasons''' Statuses exist just as helpful guides. If you can think of more categories that would be useful, that's fine. If a community stops editing because it peters out, that's one thing--someone else can come along and begin editing. If a community stops editing because of a technical restriction, that's quite another. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 03:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


'''Consensus''' To edit one article in the [[BRD cycle|BRD]] style is one thing, to ignore discussion of community another: [[:Category talk:Wiki Status]]. If You think there should be 'Locked' as Status, why don't You bring it in the discussion? I had proposed "Halted" long ago. So, let us continue there. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 10:53, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
'''Consensus''' To edit one article in the [[BRD cycle|BRD]] style is one thing, to ignore discussion of community another: [[:Category talk:Wiki status]]. If You think there should be 'Locked' as Status, why don't You bring it in the discussion? I had proposed "Halted" long ago. So, let us continue there. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 10:53, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


:'''Consensus''' I didn't create [[:Category:Locked]]. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 15:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
:'''Consensus''' I didn't create [[:Category:Locked]]. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 15:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


Yes, You did not create that page. But You assigned it <nowiki>{{WikiStatus}}</nowiki> and made it member of [[:Category:Wiki Status]] which has the same effect as creating a new WikiStatus. You added another Status to WikiStatus. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 19:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes, You did not create that page. But You assigned it <nowiki>{{Wiki status}}</nowiki> and made it member of [[:Category:Wiki status]] which has the same effect as creating a new WikiStatus. You added another Status to WikiStatus. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 19:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


:'''Status''' It already ''was'' a status of a sort: it just wasn't categorized as one. As long as it exists, it should be categorized properly for navigation. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 19:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
:'''Status''' It already ''was'' a status of a sort: it just wasn't categorized as one. As long as it exists, it should be categorized properly for navigation. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 19:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


2010 this category was created without asking anybody or even trying to introduce it to the community or giving it a definition and only for the purpose to mark a very limited set of 8 wikis of the [[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation|WikiMedia foundation]]. This was already a mistake. It was ignoring the requirements of well functioning database and ignoring the community of this wiki. You did not correct this mistake, You engraved it. The definition which You created aligned the use on [[MeatballWiki]] and ignored the original use for which it was created. So You created more confusion and contradiction. And now You are doing Your very best to defend that rather than trying to understand that it should be coordinated with the rest of us. You also made no attempt at all to introduce Your change to the community. On  17 October 2013 You assigned the not defined status Locked and did not care that it was no member of WikiStatus. In August we had this discussion [[:Category talk:Wiki Status]] which You took part in shortly about another aspect. You know pretty well that it was not finalised. You also did not contribute in a fashion to finalize it, did not make a suggestion that could have helped to solve the puzzle. You saw my Invitation2Invitations which is pointing to this unfinished discussion and actively went on to ignore this discussion for doing YOUR own thing in spite of it. If I would do such things and mess up WikiStatus matters just according to my discretion I think I would get blocked again. Your mission statement "I like the idea of fostering community between wikis and the larger movement for free and open culture..." is not reflected in Your edits here. Or should that be translated as: "I like the idea but will not actively contribute to it." ?
2010 this category was created without asking anybody or even trying to introduce it to the community or giving it a definition and only for the purpose to mark a very limited set of 8 wikis of the [[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation|WikiMedia foundation]]. This was already a mistake. It was ignoring the requirements of well functioning database and ignoring the community of this wiki. You did not correct this mistake, You engraved it. The definition which You created aligned the use on [[MeatballWiki]] and ignored the original use for which it was created. So You created more confusion and contradiction. And now You are doing Your very best to defend that rather than trying to understand that it should be coordinated with the rest of us. You also made no attempt at all to introduce Your change to the community. On  17 October 2013 You assigned the not defined status Locked and did not care that it was no member of WikiStatus. In August we had this discussion [[:Category talk:Wiki status]] which You took part in shortly about another aspect. You know pretty well that it was not finalised. You also did not contribute in a fashion to finalize it, did not make a suggestion that could have helped to solve the puzzle. You saw my Invitation2Invitations which is pointing to this unfinished discussion and actively went on to ignore this discussion for doing YOUR own thing in spite of it. If I would do such things and mess up WikiStatus matters just according to my discretion I think I would get blocked again. Your mission statement "I like the idea of fostering community between wikis and the larger movement for free and open culture..." is not reflected in Your edits here. Or should that be translated as: "I like the idea but will not actively contribute to it." ?


:'''Okay''' You need to calm down. I was busy in August and didn't get around to those discussions except (as you pointed out) briefly as an aside. This site is an informal repository of wikis: sometimes, a strict definition is not possible or useful or necessary. If you want one here, fine. I respect that you're trying to bring more structure here but you're frankly being rude to me and it's not going to accomplish anything positive. Take a minute and think about how you want to act toward me: I haven't done anything disrespectful to you. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 21:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
:'''Okay''' You need to calm down. I was busy in August and didn't get around to those discussions except (as you pointed out) briefly as an aside. This site is an informal repository of wikis: sometimes, a strict definition is not possible or useful or necessary. If you want one here, fine. I respect that you're trying to bring more structure here but you're frankly being rude to me and it's not going to accomplish anything positive. Take a minute and think about how you want to act toward me: I haven't done anything disrespectful to you. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 21:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Line 158: Line 158:


I may be more ''direct'' in my style of discussion than many people like. But I do not want to engage in an [[edit war]] with anybody, admin or not. Regarding the Category:Locked I would prefer to remove it completely and replace the status of the 8-10 Wikis by C:Dormant for now. And the discussion about the status question should continue. If You think Locked is a good term for any status You could bring it in this discussion with supporting arguments. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 21:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
I may be more ''direct'' in my style of discussion than many people like. But I do not want to engage in an [[edit war]] with anybody, admin or not. Regarding the Category:Locked I would prefer to remove it completely and replace the status of the 8-10 Wikis by C:Dormant for now. And the discussion about the status question should continue. If You think Locked is a good term for any status You could bring it in this discussion with supporting arguments. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 21:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
:'''Done''' [[:Category talk:Wiki Status#Category:Locked]]. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 21:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
:'''Done''' [[:Category talk:Wiki status#Category:Locked]]. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 21:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


==Request for [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] concerns==
==Request for [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] concerns==
Line 250: Line 250:
Care with this can establish for the community that administrators have the privilege in order to serve the community, not merely their own opinion. It can help to build community. Thanks. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 23:22, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Care with this can establish for the community that administrators have the privilege in order to serve the community, not merely their own opinion. It can help to build community. Thanks. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 23:22, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
:'''Conflict''' For what it's worth, your points are well-taken. I don't want to seem like I'm ignoring you. I disagree with some of what you said and agree with some parts wholeheartedly. Manorainjan has clearly been causing problems and I've warned him about his behavior. Your posts are thoughtful and well-spoken but at the risk of seeming aloof, I don't want to go too far down the rabbit hole on this without more input from other members or at least more time so that someone else can respond. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 06:27, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
:'''Conflict''' For what it's worth, your points are well-taken. I don't want to seem like I'm ignoring you. I disagree with some of what you said and agree with some parts wholeheartedly. Manorainjan has clearly been causing problems and I've warned him about his behavior. Your posts are thoughtful and well-spoken but at the risk of seeming aloof, I don't want to go too far down the rabbit hole on this without more input from other members or at least more time so that someone else can respond. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 06:27, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
::Sure. We did not allow L. to create whatever he wanted on [[Wikiversity]], because his recent-favorite topics can be very hot, and we don't need the disruption. We pointed to how he could actually accomplish some of what he wanted -- participating in the creation of ethical guidelines -- but he decided on one issue, the suicide material, to go to [[Wikibooks]], which had already decided as a community to allow such material (and so has Wikipedia.) On the other main problem issue, we'll call it CP (to be clear, none of his sites have been "Child Pornography," but some contain material that can be construed as advocacy for personal sexual freedom, and that, in the WMF wikis, can raise issues of "Child Protection." He has apparently abandoned that issue on WMF wikis.
::Sure. We did not allow L. to create whatever he wanted on [[:Category:Wikiversity|Wikiversity]], because his recent-favorite topics can be very hot, and we don't need the disruption. We pointed to how he could actually accomplish some of what he wanted -- participating in the creation of ethical guidelines -- but he decided on one issue, the suicide material, to go to [[:Category:Wikibooks|Wikibooks]], which had already decided as a community to allow such material (and so has [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]].) On the other main problem issue, we'll call it CP (to be clear, none of his sites have been "Child Pornography," but some contain material that can be construed as advocacy for personal sexual freedom, and that, in the WMF wikis, can raise issues of "Child Protection." He has apparently abandoned that issue on WMF wikis.
::Many people explode when this topic is around. I am a parent myself.... That happened on [[RationalWiki]], which previously had a defacto policy that anything could be discussed. He stopped when warned, but people then pursued him. We saw that lead to disruption here. WikiIndex is absolutely not set up to discuss these issues and handle what will arise.
::Many people explode when this topic is around. I am a parent myself.... That happened on [[RationalWiki]], which previously had a defacto policy that anything could be discussed. He stopped when warned, but people then pursued him. We saw that lead to disruption here. WikiIndex is absolutely not set up to discuss these issues and handle what will arise.


Line 259: Line 259:
::Thanks, in any case. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 16:23, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
::Thanks, in any case. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 16:23, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


==Template:W==
==Template:Wp==
Is there a reason why it's necessary to delete [[Template:W]], which has a number of [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:W|transclusions]]? If so, a deletion summary would have made it unnecessary to ask the reason. Thanks, [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 20:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Is there a reason why it's necessary to delete [[Template:Wp]], which has a number of [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Wp|transclusions]]? If so, a deletion summary would have made it unnecessary to ask the reason. Thanks, [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 20:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
:'''Undeleted''' That was an error and I have no idea how I made it: I checked all of the unused templates from the report and somehow ended up deleting that... Good eye. My apologies. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 20:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
:'''Undeleted''' That was an error and I have no idea how I made it: I checked all of the unused templates from the report and somehow ended up deleting that... Good eye. My apologies. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 20:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


Line 291: Line 291:
Now, in case of Y. my edit was:  
Now, in case of Y. my edit was:  
<nowiki>{{language|en|N}}
<nowiki>{{language|en|N}}
Summary: Please adjust and add as appropriate, see [[Category:EnglishSpeakers]] and [[Category:Language]].</nowiki>
Summary: Please adjust and add as appropriate, see [[Category:English speakers]] and [[Category:Language]].</nowiki>


His user page started English. If that is not his first language, he can change that himself. There is not need whatsoever for You to do anything there. And there is no danger ahead that forces You to take immediate action. But You go over it like fire patrol! The result is, that edit-war like comments are on his user page. This is what You invited without consideration. So, don't call me rude now, accept that You are trigger happy. It's not the first time. It is a consistent pattern of Your behaviour. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 10:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
His user page started English. If that is not his first language, he can change that himself. There is not need whatsoever for You to do anything there. And there is no danger ahead that forces You to take immediate action. But You go over it like fire patrol! The result is, that edit-war like comments are on his user page. This is what You invited without consideration. So, don't call me rude now, accept that You are trigger happy. It's not the first time. It is a consistent pattern of Your behaviour. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 10:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Line 360: Line 360:
[[Special:Contributions/Neeraj Rawat]]  This ghost came out of Your flask ;-)
[[Special:Contributions/Neeraj Rawat]]  This ghost came out of Your flask ;-)


==Weigh in on [[WikiIndex:ServerName#Poll]]?==
==Weigh in on [[WikiIndex:Proposal: domain name change#Poll]]?==
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to a potential [[WikiIndex:ServerName|decision to change the domain of this wiki]].  I hope you'll weigh in with your opinion.  Thanks! [[User:BrandonCsSanders|BrandonCsSanders]] ([[User talk:BrandonCsSanders|talk]]) 20:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to a potential [[WikiIndex:Proposal: domain name change|decision to change the domain of this wiki]].  I hope you'll weigh in with your opinion.  Thanks! [[User:BrandonCsSanders|BrandonCsSanders]] ([[User talk:BrandonCsSanders|talk]]) 20:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


==Did Your account get hacked?==
==Did Your account get hacked?==
Line 473: Line 473:


==MW Zip==
==MW Zip==
Please semiprotect [[MW Zip]] --[[User talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 05:04, 25 October 2016 (PDT)
Please semiprotect [[:Category:MW Zip|MW Zip]] --[[User talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 05:04, 25 October 2016 (PDT)
:'''Protection''' For now, there is at least ''something'' live online. Once it goes down, then I think we can link to Internet Archive. I agree that the back-and-forth edit war is not productive though, so I will change the protection in the meantime. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 08:17, 25 October 2016 (PDT)
:'''Protection''' For now, there is at least ''something'' live online. Once it goes down, then I think we can link to Internet Archive. I agree that the back-and-forth edit war is not productive though, so I will change the protection in the meantime. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 08:17, 25 October 2016 (PDT)


==[[:Category:Free MediaWiki wiki farms]]==
==[[:Category:Free MediaWiki wiki farm]]==
You accepted this edit by Your following edit.
You accepted this edit by Your following edit.
http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Category:Free_MediaWiki_wiki_farms&diff=next&oldid=177843
https://WikiIndex.org/index.php?title=Category:Free_MediaWiki_wiki_farm&diff=next&oldid=177843
Are You sure no information got lost? --[[User talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 03:55, 14 December 2016 (PST)
Are You sure no information got lost? --[[User talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 03:55, 14 December 2016 (PST)