Category:NPOV: Difference between revisions

NPOV in regard to Wikipedia
(NPOV in regard to Wikipedia)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Category:NPOV''' — '''NPOV''' is the common acronym for <u>'''n'''</u>eutral <u>'''p'''</u>oint <u>'''o'''</u>f <u>'''v'''</u>iew.  This ethos of this particular {{tag|point of view}} is supposed to be one of the main, core requirements of [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]] – though many commentators would say that Wikipedia fails in this area.  There are many other wikis, listed below which are able to comply with this ethos.
{{Rename|Neutral point of view|acronyms are geeky, plain English is better}}


[[Category:Community acronym]]
"NPOV" is the acronym for the phrase "neutral point of view".
<br> The phrase "neutral point of view" is simply a weird way of saying "having neutral wording in controversial matters".
<br> The phrase "neutral point of view" was coined by the evangelical christian Larry Sanger in early 2001,
<br> in the course of setting-up Wikipedia, though he had thought of the phrase at an earlier time.
 
Wikipedia's controlling establishment portrays Wikipedia as neutral,
<br> via its claim that it has a so-called "neutral point of view",
<br> but that claim is in fact highly spurious,
<br> with parts of Wikipedia reading like an insane Orwellian propaganda rag.
<br> That spurious policy serves to deceive casual outside-observers,
<br> so that they might donate to Wikipedia under that spurious pretense.
<br> The fact that that action is being perpetrated via the medium of the internet
<br> makes that action constitute <i>wire fraud</i>.
 
The wikis that are listed below likewise claim to comply with this policy,
<br> but whether or not they actually do so is up to each individual reader to judge for themself.
 
 
{{Main|Neutral point of view}}
{{See also|WikiIndex:Neutral point of view}}