WikiIndex:Duplicates: Difference between revisions

re...
No edit summary
(re...)
Line 12: Line 12:
It's not clear whether the less common spelling should be categorized. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 15:53, 24 February 2007 (PST)
It's not clear whether the less common spelling should be categorized. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 15:53, 24 February 2007 (PST)
: My quick answer is, "no."  Do you see it differently? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:58, 28 February 2007 (PST)
: My quick answer is, "no."  Do you see it differently? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:58, 28 February 2007 (PST)
 
:: If you browse a category, you could count some wikis more than once, that's not so good for statistics. Yes, I think, we shouldn't categorize redirected alternative spellings. = Your Quick Answer is right! (Maybe we should remove this talk, for a clearer FAQ Answer.) --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 13:55, 28 February 2007 (PST)
[[Category:FAQ]]
[[Category:FAQ]]
4,624

edits