Talk:Double Duty for Basic Article Template: Difference between revisions

meta
(recursive recurisvity)
(meta)
Line 1: Line 1:
== meta ==
What are thoughts about putting questions/brainstorms/discussions in the "Talk:" namespace?
What are thoughts about putting questions/brainstorms/discussions in the "Talk:" namespace?
----
: If the discussion is about a particular thing, then using the talk pages for that thing is a good idea.  I'm not so sure about using the talk pages for a non-thing, like this page. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:50, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)


== wikis and wiki engines ==
The basic article template "Wiki List" is being used for Engine category pages.  Almost all engines have a wiki, for example, MoinMoin has MoinMoinWiki.  In this case, there is a page for the wiki ([[MoinMoinWiki]]) as well as a page for the engine category ([[:category:MoinMoin]]).  I believe this is correct.  In the case of Lizzy, there is just a single page for both the wiki and the engine: ([[:category:Lizzy]]).  This creates a recursive situation where the article points to itself.  I'm not sure this is a big problem, but now would be a good time for us to establish consistent rules.
The basic article template "Wiki List" is being used for Engine category pages.  Almost all engines have a wiki, for example, MoinMoin has MoinMoinWiki.  In this case, there is a page for the wiki ([[MoinMoinWiki]]) as well as a page for the engine category ([[:category:MoinMoin]]).  I believe this is correct.  In the case of Lizzy, there is just a single page for both the wiki and the engine: ([[:category:Lizzy]]).  This creates a recursive situation where the article points to itself.  I'm not sure this is a big problem, but now would be a good time for us to establish consistent rules.


6,456

edits