Talk:Liberapedia (Wikia): Difference between revisions
(protection) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Protection== | ==Protection== | ||
What was so horrible about my contributions that a sysop (who btw is an administrator at Liberapedia, and therefore has a conflict of interest) had to lock this article '''FOR A MONTH'''? I admit that the Cyberbullying section was [[wikipedia:WP:POINT|pointy]], but the rest was merely copyediting, and removing redundant and confusing info about the whole domain name thing. Oh, and '''you reverted a spelling correction''' | What was so horrible about my contributions that a sysop (who btw is an administrator at Liberapedia, and therefore has a conflict of interest) had to lock this article '''FOR A MONTH'''? I admit that the Cyberbullying section was [[wikipedia:WP:POINT|pointy]], but the rest was merely copyediting, and removing redundant and confusing info about the whole domain name thing. Oh, and '''you reverted a spelling correction''' | ||
You removed content from the page and that can be a blockable offense at at wikis. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 02:04, 8 July 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 06:04, 8 July 2009
I've deleted the category Liberapedia. There used to be a second wiki in the category, Liberapediapedia. Liberapediapedia perished with ScribbleWiki. There's no point in a category with only one wiki. Proxima Centauri 15:17, 21 November 2008 (EST)
Protection
What was so horrible about my contributions that a sysop (who btw is an administrator at Liberapedia, and therefore has a conflict of interest) had to lock this article FOR A MONTH? I admit that the Cyberbullying section was pointy, but the rest was merely copyediting, and removing redundant and confusing info about the whole domain name thing. Oh, and you reverted a spelling correction
You removed content from the page and that can be a blockable offense at at wikis. Proxima Centauri 02:04, 8 July 2009 (EDT)