User talk:Bob M: Difference between revisions

892 bytes added ,  8 September 2009
→‎[[ForestFire]]: hopefully clarified
(→‎[[ForestFire]]: hopefully clarified)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


Hello - here is a bit of an explanation about [http://www.wikiindex.org/User_talk:This_is_not_the_solution#Thanks_to_everyone_for_the_cooling_off_-_here_is_my_idea_on_how_to_move_through_this. current decisions]. Best, [[MarkDilley]]
Hello - here is a bit of an explanation about [http://www.wikiindex.org/User_talk:This_is_not_the_solution#Thanks_to_everyone_for_the_cooling_off_-_here_is_my_idea_on_how_to_move_through_this. current decisions]. Best, [[MarkDilley]]
: Thanks for asking me to clarify - I did on the talk pages by placing my suggested solution. Best, [[MarkDilley]]
== RationalWiki ==
RationalWiki is down again. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 07:23, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
:Unrelated to the previous crash, it's back. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 07:37, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
::Thanks for keeping me advised PC, but I've got no more control over things at RW than any other user.  Well, actually, less than some of the more technically orientated ones. The best place to keep up with (and report on) RW technical issues in the [http://rationalwiki.blogspot.com/ RW technical blog].--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 08:27, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
I know you can't do very much but the mob might try and assemble at your wiki using up yet more bandwidth so I thought I'd warn you. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 11:07, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160

edits