Proposal:Ordering on this page: Difference between revisions
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (→Proposal 17-Feb-2006: ordering on this page: it must be late - take 3) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Proposal 17-Feb-2006: ordering on this page == | ==Proposal 17-Feb-2006: ordering on this page== | ||
I re-ordered this page to put newest at the bottom to encourge us to deal with the older ones first, and move them off this page. Also, don't know if you know about this feature, but there is a '''<tt>+</tt>''' item next to the "edit" link at the top of talk pages. That feature adds a new section, without having to edit the whole page. Since that new section goes at the bottom, this re-organization allows that feature to be used on this page. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:10, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
I re-ordered this page to put newest at the bottom to encourge us to deal with the older ones first, and move them off this page. Also, don't know if you know about this feature, but there is a + item next to the "edit" link at the top of talk pages. That feature adds a new section, without having to edit the whole page. Since that new section goes at the bottom, this re-organization allows that feature to be used on this page. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:10, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
* I think that the page should be added to the top, not withstanding the section editing function. It is more friendly to read new proposals at the top. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | * I think that the page should be added to the top, not withstanding the section editing function. It is more friendly to read new proposals at the top. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | ||
** Mark, if this was moved to the archive in error, please move it back to the [[Proposals]] page so it can be further discussed. I also invite you to go further in your reasoning as it's feeling like "because I said so" again. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 22:47, 19 Feb 2006 (EST) | ** Mark, if this was moved to the archive in error, please move it back to the [[:Category:Proposals|Proposals]] page so it can be further discussed. I also invite you to go further in your reasoning as it's feeling like "because I said so" again. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 22:47, 19 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
*** Mark, tell us more why this is still active? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:06, 21 Feb 2006 (EST) | *** Mark, tell us more why this is still active? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:06, 21 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
'''Yes''', and I propose that we make an area for the proposals we've moved off this list, perhaps "ProposalArchive" or something like that --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 18:40, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | '''Yes''', and I propose that we make an area for the proposals we've moved off this list, perhaps "{{tag|ProposalArchive}}" or something like that --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 18:40, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
* ProposalArchive and | * ProposalArchive and Guidelines, agreed upon, would be more specific to what happened to the ideas. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | ||
** [[Guidelines]] will be sufficient for positive decisions, and [[ProposalArchive]] for history of all these conversations. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:06, 21 Feb 2006 (EST) | ** [[WikiIndex:Guidelines]] will be sufficient for positive decisions, and [[:Category:ProposalArchive|ProposalArchive]] for history of all these conversations. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:06, 21 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
** I agree --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 03:20, 23 Feb 2006 (EST) | ** I agree --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 03:20, 23 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
Wikifying the list has definately made this proposal non grata. [[MarkDilley]] | Wikifying the list has definately made this proposal non grata. [[MarkDilley]] | ||
[[Category:ProposalArchive]] | [[Category:ProposalArchive|Ordering on this page]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:59, 13 September 2014
Proposal 17-Feb-2006: ordering on this pageEdit
I re-ordered this page to put newest at the bottom to encourge us to deal with the older ones first, and move them off this page. Also, don't know if you know about this feature, but there is a + item next to the "edit" link at the top of talk pages. That feature adds a new section, without having to edit the whole page. Since that new section goes at the bottom, this re-organization allows that feature to be used on this page. TedErnst | talk 12:10, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
- I think that the page should be added to the top, not withstanding the section editing function. It is more friendly to read new proposals at the top. MarkDilley | talk
Yes, and I propose that we make an area for the proposals we've moved off this list, perhaps "ProposalArchive" or something like that --Raymond King | talk 18:40, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
- ProposalArchive and Guidelines, agreed upon, would be more specific to what happened to the ideas. MarkDilley | talk
- WikiIndex:Guidelines will be sufficient for positive decisions, and ProposalArchive for history of all these conversations. TedErnst | talk 13:06, 21 Feb 2006 (EST)
- I agree --Raymond King | talk 03:20, 23 Feb 2006 (EST)
Wikifying the list has definately made this proposal non grata. MarkDilley