User talk:Rock-O-Jello/Archive 3

NOTE: this 'User talk:Rock-O-Jello/Archive 3' page is an archive of older discussions. Please place new comments on the currently active talk page of this archive, thanks!

Archive

You can learn from User talk:MarkDilley how to link to Your archives. --Manorainjan 17:41, 29 June 2015 (PDT)

Protection I took the initiative to protect your two talk page archives. If you want them unprotected, just ask and I will leave them back to being editable. Koavf (talk) 14:16, 30 June 2015 (PDT)

Thanks, Koav! NovelEater (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2015 (PDT)

Owner

Where did You get this definition? --Manorainjan 00:11, 4 July 2015 (PDT)

Help:Summary

As I said in User talk:Rock-O-Jello/Archive 2, please take care to supply meaningful summaries. "Web edit" is useless. The comment should be about what You changed, not where from You edit. --Manorainjan 00:18, 4 July 2015 (PDT)

Tags "Web edit" is a special tag from MediaWiki. It is automatically generated. Koavf (talk) 07:26, 4 July 2015 (PDT)

Interesting. Why does MediaWiki do this and of what help could that be for whom? Manorainjan 07:38, 4 July 2015 (PDT)

Tagging MediaWiki has a wiki with extensive documentation. Tags like this can be helpful if you have a wiki and want to see if it works well with mobile browsers. For instance, maybe mobile users always seem to have weird carriage returns in the middle of their text. You can adjust for that and make the browsing experience easier for them. Koavf (talk) 20:00, 4 July 2015 (PDT)

OK, this is obviously the result of Extension:MobileFrontend. And there are no reports of problems that require the mobile edits to be tagged for analytical purpose. Therefore I think, this tag should be deactivated/deleted. Right now it only ballasts the Recent Changes list and similar places with text of no use at all.Manorainjan 02:12, 5 July 2015 (PDT)

Agree with Koav. --NovelEater (talk) 14:54, 7 July 2015 (PDT)

Koav is a microcosm. With which part of it do You agree? With that "mobile users always seem to have weird carriage returns in the middle of their text."? Manorainjan 15:03, 7 July 2015 (PDT)

Adrian (Ajraddatz)

Your delete request did not bear logic. What where You thinking? --Manorainjan 21:36, 24 July 2015 (PDT)

First off, he's not a wiki farmer. Second, you're not an admin so I don't see why you're even "warning" me in the first place. NovelEater (talk) 16:14, 26 July 2015 (PDT)

I did not say he is a wiki farmer. So, where comes Your "Fist off.." from?

And Why are You thinking I was warning You? I was asking, what You where thinking? Manorainjan 16:18, 26 July 2015 (PDT)

What a bout a sensible answer some time? --Manorainjan 16:26, 24 August 2015 (PDT)

Stop If another user doesn't want to talk on his own talk page, leave him alone. Pestering other users will get you blocked. Koavf (talk) 21:59, 24 August 2015 (PDT)

What for are talk pages other than for talking? Manorainjan 02:27, 25 August 2015 (PDT)

What you're doing, though, is definitely pestering, Manorainjan. It's like you think you're the leader or something, talking down to users and edit warring. Please stop or I will see to it you are blocked. And let my article be deleted, please. --Rock-O-Jello (talk) 07:07, 25 August 2015 (PDT)

So You mean to say, that whenever a difference of opinion arises where You can not provide an reasonable argument You go like: "Don't pester me or I will get you gagged by the next best admin on account of argumentum ad hominem!"? --Manorainjan 07:18, 25 August 2015 (PDT)

Harassment Everyone here is tired of you acting aggressive and then being coy about it. You're an adult and you should understand the difference between a good-natured question and rude harassment. If you don't, then maybe you shouldn't edit here. Koavf (talk) 07:12, 25 August 2015 (PDT)

Don't be silly! You both do not account for "everyone" and I never acted coy. Also "aggressive" is here a very subjective interpretation. "Insisting" or "sustained" or many other less offensive words would do as well and would be less "aggressive" on Your part. Anyway: All those "argumentations" from Your side are nothing but evading the real arguments and are solemnly argumentum ad hominem and as such not constructive at all. --Manorainjan 07:24, 25 August 2015 (PDT)

We're not being "silly", Manorainjan, we're serious. You have harassed users before and would've been blocked for it had an admin not decided to let you off with a warning. --Rock-O-Jello (talk) 07:31, 25 August 2015 (PDT)

You continue to use nothing but argumentum ad hominem. I havent'd heard a single real argument from You by now. Manorainjan 07:35, 25 August 2015 (PDT)

Okay You're done here. Stop posting to this user's talk unless you are asked. Koavf (talk) 07:39, 25 August 2015 (PDT)