User:Torchickens: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "AccountUsed2011" to "Account used in 2011")
m (Text replacement - "Female Wiki People" to "Female wiki people")
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
==My personal philosophy on Wikis 'WikiEthics'==
==My personal philosophy on Wikis 'WikiEthics'==
*[[:Category:Information|Information]] should be free and [[:Category:Open content|accessible to all]].
*[[:Category:Information|Information]] should be free and [[:Category:Open content|accessible to all]].
**I believe [[:Category:PayToEdit|pay-to-edit]] Wikis are this an allusion to [[:Category:University|universities]] and other [[:Category:Institutions|institutions]], which I believe should not charge us to study. I believe they monopolize on our own intelligence.
**I believe [[:Category:Pay to edit|pay-to-edit]] Wikis are this an allusion to [[:Category:University|universities]] and other [[:Category:Institutions|institutions]], which I believe should not charge us to study. I believe they monopolize on our own intelligence.
***I support the [[Anti-Wikia Alliance]] to some extent.  [[:Category:Wikia|Wikia]] should not make changes to its layout permanently without the consent of its individual Wikis.
***I support the [[Anti-Wikia Alliance]] to some extent.  [[:Category:Wikia|Wikia]] should not make changes to its layout permanently without the consent of its individual Wikis.
***However, I believe that people should not set up Wikis on the Wikia service for the sake of simply [[:Category:GoalAbandoned|abandoning]] them and 'sporking' them on to an [[:Category:Ex-Wikia|independent Wiki]] for later.
***However, I believe that people should not set up Wikis on the Wikia service for the sake of simply [[:Category:Goal abandoned|abandoning]] them and 'sporking' them on to an [[:Category:Ex-Wikia|independent Wiki]] for later.


*I reject the irony of [[English Wikipedia|Wikipedia's]] [[notability]] criteria for deleting articles or [[revert]]ing edits which are not 'verifiable', yet keeping statements quoted by e.g. the local press.
*I reject the irony of [[English Wikipedia|Wikipedia's]] [[notability]] criteria for deleting articles or [[revert]]ing edits which are not 'verifiable', yet keeping statements quoted by e.g. the local press.
Line 24: Line 24:
Infinite regression and first-cause 'paradoxes' are solvable because logic doesn't have to be linear.
Infinite regression and first-cause 'paradoxes' are solvable because logic doesn't have to be linear.


[[Category:Female Wiki People]]
[[Category:Female wiki people]]
[[Category:Wiki People from the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Wiki people from the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Account used in 2011]]
[[Category:Account used in 2011]]
[[Category:AccountUsed2021]]
[[Category:Account used in 2021]]

Latest revision as of 13:25, 11 November 2023

Hi my name is Evie :] I love cute things, am super girly and feminine, and computer science; some natural sciences~.

Also my girlfriend is awesome, hope we get married.

The fun

Sanrio and Nintendo are awesome ^_^ as is Z80.

The serious

I don't know what to do with my life..

My personal philosophy on Wikis 'WikiEthics'[edit]

  • I reject the irony of Wikipedia's notability criteria for deleting articles or reverting edits which are not 'verifiable', yet keeping statements quoted by e.g. the local press.
    • There is a slight "relative autonomy" with smaller articles, which the 'WikiTyrants' miss out, which can be a double-edge sword when it comes to validity.

The silly ^^

Infinite regression and first-cause 'paradoxes' are solvable because logic doesn't have to be linear.