Template talk:Newest additions: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "{{TOCright}}" to "{{TOC right}}")
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TOC right}}
50% for each column - why is this needed?  The reason I eliminated it was because different browsers display things in different ways.  [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:35, 15 June 2006 (EDT)
50% for each column - why is this needed?  The reason I eliminated it was because different browsers display things in different ways.  [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:35, 15 June 2006 (EDT)


== bullet, date, item ==
==bullet, date, item==
 
I have no problem with bullet, date, item format.  When It's bullet, date, item and then next line is indented bullet, item it starts to look funny to me.  That's why I made the date line without the bullet.  Unfortunately, that doesn't play nice with lines that are bullet, date, item.  Maybe indented bullet is the answer?
I have no problem with bullet, date, item format.  When It's bullet, date, item and then next line is indented bullet, item it starts to look funny to me.  That's why I made the date line without the bullet.  Unfortunately, that doesn't play nice with lines that are bullet, date, item.  Maybe indented bullet is the answer?


Line 18: Line 18:
[[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:39, 15 June 2006 (EDT)
[[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:39, 15 June 2006 (EDT)


== too complicated ==
==too complicated==
 
I think it is a valiant effort, idea and implementation, but when I click add yourself, all I see is code, and I would rather it be a single plain list. [[MarkDilley]]
I think it is a valiant effort, idea and implementation, but when I click add yourself, all I see is code, and I would rather it be a single plain list. [[MarkDilley]]


: Would you like me to move it back to the simplest possible template?  If so, what would you like [[Welcome]] to look like.  I'm happy to fix this since I broke it, if you like. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 22:37, 16 June 2006 (EDT)
:Would you like me to move it back to the simplest possible template?  If so, what would you like [[Welcome]] to look like.  I'm happy to fix this since I broke it, if you like. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 22:37, 16 June 2006 (EDT)
 
== cannot edit template ?? ==


==cannot edit template ??==
I got the followinf message, when I wanted to save my changes (cut older news etc.):
I got the followinf message, when I wanted to save my changes (cut older news etc.):
  Spam protection filter
  Spam protection filter
Line 37: Line 35:
  Return to Welcome.
  Return to Welcome.
What can I do? --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:42, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
What can I do? --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:42, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
: I found a solution by myself, thank you for attention --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:48, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
:I found a solution by myself, thank you for attention --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:48, 31 July 2007 (EDT)


== how many items should be listed ==
==how many items should be listed==
 
Sometimes I clen up, how many should I leave? 50 Items? --[[Special:Contributions/87.160.184.123|87.160.184.123]] 16:33, 9 October 2007 (EDT) (Wolf) BTW, has anyone a clue why I seem to be not logged in, when I edit this template? --[[User:Peu|Wolf]]
Sometimes I clen up, how many should I leave? 50 Items? --[[User:87.160.184.123|87.160.184.123]] 16:33, 9 October 2007 (EDT) (Wolf) BTW, has anyone a clue why I seem to be not logged in, when I edit this template? --[[User:Peu|Wolf]]
:oh, seems to be my browser (FF2) --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:34, 9 October 2007 (EDT)
:oh, seems to be my browser (FF2) --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:34, 9 October 2007 (EDT)


''There's no set number.  Just leave it looking in balance on the front page.  Older items can be moved to the archive page, which keeps everything. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 10:57, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
''There's no set number.  Just leave it looking in balance on the front page.  Older items can be moved to the archive page, which keeps everything. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 10:57, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
::where is this archive located? --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 12:19, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
''[[WikiIndex:Newest additions archive]] - [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:35, 10 October 2007 (EDT)''
The template has a second row now. Should I go fix this? [[User:Swordman|Swordman]] 17:19, 23 July 2011 (PDT)
Never mind. I archived both the January and February entries.[[User:Swordman|Swordman]] 17:45, 23 July 2011 (PDT)
==Automated or not at all==
What a name: Recent visitors ?
*The name got nothing to do with what is going on. The only thing not mentioned in the table is the visitor.
*It is about new wiki entries in the Main space. So the name should be something like: "newest additions to the WikiIndex"
*Why do our "visitors" have to fill this form? (and don't even get mentioned) Is it not possible to create those entries automatically every time a new wiki page is crated by using the template?
*Shall we really kill the time of our valued "visitors" an our own time for that?
--[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 00:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:23, 30 September 2022

50% for each column - why is this needed? The reason I eliminated it was because different browsers display things in different ways. TedErnst | talk 15:35, 15 June 2006 (EDT)

bullet, date, item[edit]

I have no problem with bullet, date, item format. When It's bullet, date, item and then next line is indented bullet, item it starts to look funny to me. That's why I made the date line without the bullet. Unfortunately, that doesn't play nice with lines that are bullet, date, item. Maybe indented bullet is the answer?

date

date

?

TedErnst | talk 15:39, 15 June 2006 (EDT)

too complicated[edit]

I think it is a valiant effort, idea and implementation, but when I click add yourself, all I see is code, and I would rather it be a single plain list. MarkDilley

Would you like me to move it back to the simplest possible template? If so, what would you like Welcome to look like. I'm happy to fix this since I broke it, if you like. TedErnst | talk 22:37, 16 June 2006 (EDT)

cannot edit template ??[edit]

I got the followinf message, when I wanted to save my changes (cut older news etc.):

Spam protection filter
From WikiIndex
Jump to: navigation, search

The page you wanted to save was blocked by the spam filter. This is probably caused by a link to an external site.

The following text is what triggered our spam filter: http://www.wikiindex.org

Return to Welcome.

What can I do? --Wolf | talk 16:42, 31 July 2007 (EDT)

I found a solution by myself, thank you for attention --Wolf | talk 16:48, 31 July 2007 (EDT)

how many items should be listed[edit]

Sometimes I clen up, how many should I leave? 50 Items? --87.160.184.123 16:33, 9 October 2007 (EDT) (Wolf) BTW, has anyone a clue why I seem to be not logged in, when I edit this template? --Wolf

oh, seems to be my browser (FF2) --Wolf | talk 16:34, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

There's no set number. Just leave it looking in balance on the front page. Older items can be moved to the archive page, which keeps everything. TedErnst | talk 10:57, 10 October 2007 (EDT)

where is this archive located? --Wolf | talk 12:19, 10 October 2007 (EDT)

WikiIndex:Newest additions archive - TedErnst | talk 12:35, 10 October 2007 (EDT)

The template has a second row now. Should I go fix this? Swordman 17:19, 23 July 2011 (PDT)

Never mind. I archived both the January and February entries.Swordman 17:45, 23 July 2011 (PDT)

Automated or not at all[edit]

What a name: Recent visitors ?

  • The name got nothing to do with what is going on. The only thing not mentioned in the table is the visitor.
  • It is about new wiki entries in the Main space. So the name should be something like: "newest additions to the WikiIndex"
  • Why do our "visitors" have to fill this form? (and don't even get mentioned) Is it not possible to create those entries automatically every time a new wiki page is crated by using the template?
  • Shall we really kill the time of our valued "visitors" an our own time for that?

--Manorainjan (talk) 00:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)