WikiIndex talk:Proposals: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Proposal: 14-Feb-2006: Structured data: How is this different from Meatball or Wikipedia?)
(moving to article page)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Proposal: 17-Feb-2006: Tag and category use==
* Tags would be used in the description field of the page, either inline or as a bulleted list, whatever the editor wishes, using the tag template.


example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit&section=1
* Categories would be used as media wiki currently understands them for the footer grouping.  They would be placed above the template code for two reasons:
** 1- cleaner for the site/newbies
** 2- put them infront of template categories in the footer section, to highlight them.
example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit
==Proposal: 14-Feb-2006: Structured data ==
* What would the definition be for [[StructuredData]]
** I don't know what this is (and yes, I've read the page). [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:01, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
: Trying to clarify that because this site uses structured data, some things are done a little differently than other wiki. (wikipedia, meatball, etc).  I think Structured Data is  new to the wiki family, it is to me, so being clear about it will help.
:: I still don't understand.  How is this different from Meatball or Wikipedia? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:11, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
==Proposal: 13-Feb-2006: Authentic language categories ==
* see [[:Category:Spanish]] discussion for more info/example.
==Proposal: 29-Jan-2006: New categories production==
* We make the actual new cateogies after x time or x wiki fall into that category, pre-launch.  [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
** Additional Categories.  I found that if you add an additional category to a page (see CodeBook and AddYourOwn) you must also add the category command somewhere on the page so that it also categorized the article properly.  I am concerned that this will be confusing to users, so for now, I am using this format to at least keep it all in one place: --[[User:Rathbone|Ray]] 17:04, 19 Jan 2006 (EST)
*** Ray, I know what you mean about the proper way to create new categories, but I'm not sure what you're saying about "this format."  Can you clarify, please?  [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:02, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
==Proposal: 28-Jan-2006: Coding comments for more transparent clarity==
* More transparent wiki conversation/work. We start to code our page work in the summary as much as possilbe, as to model transparent conversation on the recent changes page, for newbies, and really ourselves.  I just think it will only help to do as much coding as possible :-) [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
** I agree and will try to do this --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 20:49, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)

Latest revision as of 07:35, 19 February 2006

Retrieved from "https://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=WikiIndex_talk:Proposals&oldid=13827"