User talk:Gulik: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "AccountUsed2009" to "Account used in 2009")
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
WelcomePleased to see you here. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 06:56, 2 August 2008 (EDT)
{{TOC right}}
==Welcome==
Pleased to see you here. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 06:56, 2 August 2008 (EDT)
:Hi Gulik.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 11:27, 2 August 2008 (EDT)
:Hi Gulik.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 11:27, 2 August 2008 (EDT)
Sssssss... Get out of bed! ''{scares Gulik out of bed}'' --[[User:Snuffleupagus|Snuffleupagus]] 12:32, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
Sssssss... Get out of bed! ''{scares Gulik out of bed}'' --[[User:Snuffleupagus|Snuffleupagus]] 12:32, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
:Yeah, right.  There's no such thing as a Snuffleupagus! --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 15:06, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
:Yeah, right.  There's no such thing as a Snuffleupagus! --[[User talk:Gulik|Gulik]] 15:06, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
 
== I was talking about Deborha ==


==I was talking about Deborha==
I am an eternal optimist, until it is time to not be :-) ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
I am an eternal optimist, until it is time to not be :-) ~~ [[MarkDilley]]


== Conservapedia ==
==Conservapedia==
Thanks for your [[edit]]s which a bunch of numbers [[revert]]ed. I'm an admin here, that means I must try to be a bit impartial.  Therefore I've moved most of the criticism into a new article, [[The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. The Conservapedians don't like that either. See [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]].  At the moment I'm trying to keep most of the criticism in the war article which is linked to the [[Conservapedia]] and the [[RationalWiki]] articles.  Unless or until an impartial admin enters this [[edit war]] I don't know what else I can do. Unless Conservapedians remove criticism again or remove the link to the war article again it may be best to keep most of the criticism in the War article.  If  Conservapedians remove criticism again or remove the link you and I will have to re-evaluate depending on what they do. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 05:49, 18 November 2008 (EST)
[[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 05:36, 18 November 2008 (EST)
:I still think the complaints belong on the CP page, on the ground that they are ''real problems'' with CP and the idiots running it, not just Internet Drama.  Like you said, I can leave them off for now, but I'll start putting them back if someone takes the link out or removes what criticism is still there, on the "South Park principle".  (If a censor complains something's too offensive, rework it to be MORE offensive and send it back to them.)  :) --[[User talk:Gulik|Gulik]] 15:11, 18 November 2008 (EST)
:(update) GENTLEMEN!  Operation Southeast Park is NOW IN EFFECT!  I expect teh Internets to CRUMBLE under my onslaught shortly! :-P --[[User talk:Gulik|Gulik]] 20:32, 18 November 2008 (EST)


Thanks for your edits which a bunch of numbers reverted. I'm an admin here, that means I must try to be a bit impartial.  Therefore I've moved most of the criticisl into a new article, [[The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 05:36, 18 November 2008 (EST)
[[Category:Orphaned talk page]]
[[Category:Account used in 2008]]
[[Category:Account used in 2009]]

Latest revision as of 11:31, 9 December 2022

Welcome[edit]

Pleased to see you here. Proxima Centauri 06:56, 2 August 2008 (EDT)

Hi Gulik.--Bob M 11:27, 2 August 2008 (EDT)

Sssssss... Get out of bed! {scares Gulik out of bed} --Snuffleupagus 12:32, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Yeah, right. There's no such thing as a Snuffleupagus! --Gulik 15:06, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

I was talking about Deborha[edit]

I am an eternal optimist, until it is time to not be :-) ~~ MarkDilley

Conservapedia[edit]

Thanks for your edits which a bunch of numbers reverted. I'm an admin here, that means I must try to be a bit impartial. Therefore I've moved most of the criticism into a new article, The Conservapedia RationalWiki war. The Conservapedians don't like that either. See Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war. At the moment I'm trying to keep most of the criticism in the war article which is linked to the Conservapedia and the RationalWiki articles. Unless or until an impartial admin enters this edit war I don't know what else I can do. Unless Conservapedians remove criticism again or remove the link to the war article again it may be best to keep most of the criticism in the War article. If Conservapedians remove criticism again or remove the link you and I will have to re-evaluate depending on what they do. Proxima Centauri 05:49, 18 November 2008 (EST) Proxima Centauri 05:36, 18 November 2008 (EST)

I still think the complaints belong on the CP page, on the ground that they are real problems with CP and the idiots running it, not just Internet Drama. Like you said, I can leave them off for now, but I'll start putting them back if someone takes the link out or removes what criticism is still there, on the "South Park principle". (If a censor complains something's too offensive, rework it to be MORE offensive and send it back to them.)  :) --Gulik 15:11, 18 November 2008 (EST)
(update) GENTLEMEN! Operation Southeast Park is NOW IN EFFECT! I expect teh Internets to CRUMBLE under my onslaught shortly! :-P --Gulik 20:32, 18 November 2008 (EST)