Talk:TheBestLinks.com: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Hoof Hearted moved page Talk:TheBestLinks to Talk:TheBestLinks.com without leaving a redirect: Correct wiki name)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The [http://www.thebestlinks.com/Special__3A__Statistics.html statistics] on this wiki are incredibly messed up. --[[User:Elassint|Elassint]] 18:48, 2 January 2009 (EST)
The [http://www.thebestlinks.com/Special__3A__Statistics.html statistics] on this wiki are incredibly messed up. --[[User:Elassint|Elassint]] 18:48, 2 January 2009 (EST)
:Considering the few edits and the fact that the main page has only 50.000 views, and the rest mostly under 1000, I think it's fake. But I just submitted the number they claim on the font page... --[[User:Unknown guy|Unknown guy]] 20:46, 2 January 2009 (EST)
:Considering the few edits and the fact that the main page has only 50.000 views, and the rest mostly under 1000, I think it's fake. But I just submitted the number they claim on the font page... --[[User:Unknown guy|Unknown guy]] 20:46, 2 January 2009 (EST)
::It appears to have been seeded from a Wikipedia database dump. It's most noticeable in the help pages and edit histories. &mdash;&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Comic Sans MS;">[[User:Sean Fennel]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|@]]</span> 21:36, 3 January 2009 (EST)

Latest revision as of 17:01, 14 May 2022

The statistics on this wiki are incredibly messed up. --Elassint 18:48, 2 January 2009 (EST)

Considering the few edits and the fact that the main page has only 50.000 views, and the rest mostly under 1000, I think it's fake. But I just submitted the number they claim on the font page... --Unknown guy 20:46, 2 January 2009 (EST)
It appears to have been seeded from a Wikipedia database dump. It's most noticeable in the help pages and edit histories. — User:Sean Fennel@ 21:36, 3 January 2009 (EST)