Template talk:Wiki size navigation: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== More compact version ==
==More compact version==
 
Some CSS isn't understood yet: the border color is definitely too dark, thats why I used the class wikitable. Best regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 00:32, 6 January 2012 (PST)
Some CSS isn't understood yet: the border color is definitely too dark, thats why I used the class wikitable. Best regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 00:32, 6 January 2012 (PST)
:Ooooooh - that doesn't look good on IE8 - can you revert it please, or try and fix it?  --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 03:47, 6 January 2012 (PST)
:Ooooooh - that doesn't look good on IE8 - can you revert it please, or try and fix it?  --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 03:47, 6 January 2012 (PST)
Line 6: Line 5:
:::the 'list' link looks kinda lost on the right - would make more sense to include it under the left 'wiki size' heading - especially as the [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] only displays the first 1000 entries - oh there is another bug - look at [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] and see how it has 'boilerplated' the word 'template' (not my fault - check the edit history of the list article :p) --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 04:15, 6 January 2012 (PST)
:::the 'list' link looks kinda lost on the right - would make more sense to include it under the left 'wiki size' heading - especially as the [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] only displays the first 1000 entries - oh there is another bug - look at [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] and see how it has 'boilerplated' the word 'template' (not my fault - check the edit history of the list article :p) --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 04:15, 6 January 2012 (PST)
:::: The List rendering bug seems to be fixed now. The link '''list''' - yes, it's somewhat lost on the right, but I thougt of the familiar [...] button. <br/>--[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:43, 6 January 2012 (PST)
:::: The List rendering bug seems to be fixed now. The link '''list''' - yes, it's somewhat lost on the right, but I thougt of the familiar [...] button. <br/>--[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:43, 6 January 2012 (PST)
:::::It will take some getting used to . . . :p  And maybe for the list, how about 'list of top 1000' - or would that be too messy?  Finally, the size of the word template really needs increasing - at the moment, it doesn't comply with 'accessibility' requirements for visually impared - it ought to be put underneath the 'wiki size' in brackets.  --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 10:09, 6 January 2012 (PST)
:::::It will take some getting used to . . . :p  And maybe for the list, how about 'list of top 1000' - or would that be too messy?  Finally, the size of the word template really needs increasing - at the moment, it doesn't comply with '[[:Category:Accessibility|accessibility]]' requirements for visually impared - it ought to be put underneath the 'wiki size' in brackets.  --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 10:09, 6 January 2012 (PST)
::::::Now I replaced the link to the template page with the (kind of) "about" page. Better? --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 11:04, 6 January 2012 (PST)
:::::::You deleted the link to the template.  And I personally think column headings should be bold, just like all wikitables.  I guess it looks a little 'cleaner' though . . . --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 12:30, 7 January 2012 (PST)

Latest revision as of 23:05, 22 October 2021

More compact version[edit]

Some CSS isn't understood yet: the border color is definitely too dark, thats why I used the class wikitable. Best regards --Wolf | talk 00:32, 6 January 2012 (PST)

Ooooooh - that doesn't look good on IE8 - can you revert it please, or try and fix it? --Hoof Hearted 03:47, 6 January 2012 (PST)
I think it's fixed now. What do you think? --Wolf | talk 03:55, 6 January 2012 (PST)
the 'list' link looks kinda lost on the right - would make more sense to include it under the left 'wiki size' heading - especially as the list article only displays the first 1000 entries - oh there is another bug - look at list article and see how it has 'boilerplated' the word 'template' (not my fault - check the edit history of the list article :p) --Hoof Hearted 04:15, 6 January 2012 (PST)
The List rendering bug seems to be fixed now. The link list - yes, it's somewhat lost on the right, but I thougt of the familiar [...] button.
--Wolf | talk 04:43, 6 January 2012 (PST)
It will take some getting used to . . . :p And maybe for the list, how about 'list of top 1000' - or would that be too messy? Finally, the size of the word template really needs increasing - at the moment, it doesn't comply with 'accessibility' requirements for visually impared - it ought to be put underneath the 'wiki size' in brackets. --Hoof Hearted 10:09, 6 January 2012 (PST)
Now I replaced the link to the template page with the (kind of) "about" page. Better? --Wolf | talk 11:04, 6 January 2012 (PST)
You deleted the link to the template. And I personally think column headings should be bold, just like all wikitables. I guess it looks a little 'cleaner' though . . . --Hoof Hearted 12:30, 7 January 2012 (PST)