ByThePeople: Difference between revisions
(new wiki template) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (tagging / description / unknown engine --> OddMuse You can help!) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| wiki_language = English | | wiki_language = English | ||
| wiki_editmode = OpenEdit | | wiki_editmode = OpenEdit | ||
| wiki_engine = | | wiki_engine = OddMuse | ||
| wiki_maintopic = Lifestyles | | wiki_maintopic = Lifestyles | ||
}} | }} | ||
== | ==consensus polling== | ||
ConsensusPolling is about winning together or refusing to play the game. Because it can be a laborious process, it is most appropriate when a group of individuals must collectively solve a problem that affects them all. It seeks to avoid voting for candidate options (see VotingIsEvil) when such a vote would generate winners and losers and thus divide the community that must support the result of the collective decision. | {{tag|ConsensusPolling}} is about winning together or refusing to play the game. Because it can be a laborious process, it is most appropriate when a group of individuals must {{tag|collectively}} solve a problem that affects them all. It seeks to avoid voting for candidate options (see [[:Meatball Wiki:VotingIsEvil]]) when such a vote would generate winners and losers and thus divide the community that must support the result of the collective decision. | ||
Rather than a menu of candidates to choose from, the entire process is controlled by an evolving Yes/No vote. The vote reflects the suitability of a single community-owned solution being generated through a process of collaborative CollectiveIntelligence | Rather than a menu of {{tag|candidates}} to choose from, the entire process is controlled by an evolving Yes/No vote. The vote reflects the suitability of a single community-owned solution being generated through a process of {{tag|collaborative}} {{tag|CollectiveIntelligence}}. All participants are free to change their {{tag|vote}} at any time. A yes vote says "I believe the current articulation of our solution is good enough," a no vote says "I have concerns that haven't been adequately addressed by the current solution." Only when the Yes votes pass some very high, pre-specified threshold (e.g., 90%) can the solution proposed be considered to reflect the {{tag|consensus}} of the {{tag|community}}. | ||
Revision as of 06:27, 11 April 2006
| [{{{URL}}} {{{logo}}}] | [{{{URL}}} ByThePeople] [{{{recentchanges URL}}} Recent changes] [No WikiNode] [No About] [No Mobile URL] |
|---|---|
| Founded by: | |
| Status: | [[:Category:{{{status}}}|{{{status}}}]] |
| Language: | [[:Category:Wiki {{{language}}}|{{{language}}}]] |
| Edit mode: | [[:Category:{{{editmode}}}|{{{editmode}}}]] |
| Wiki engine: | [[:Category:{{{engine}}}|{{{engine}}}]] |
| Wiki license: | [[:Category:Wiki {{{license}}}|{{{license}}}]] |
| Main topic: | [[:Category:{{{maintopic}}}|{{{maintopic}}}]] |
consensus polling
ConsensusPolling is about winning together or refusing to play the game. Because it can be a laborious process, it is most appropriate when a group of individuals must collectively solve a problem that affects them all. It seeks to avoid voting for candidate options (see Meatball Wiki:VotingIsEvil) when such a vote would generate winners and losers and thus divide the community that must support the result of the collective decision.
Rather than a menu of candidates to choose from, the entire process is controlled by an evolving Yes/No vote. The vote reflects the suitability of a single community-owned solution being generated through a process of collaborative CollectiveIntelligence. All participants are free to change their vote at any time. A yes vote says "I believe the current articulation of our solution is good enough," a no vote says "I have concerns that haven't been adequately addressed by the current solution." Only when the Yes votes pass some very high, pre-specified threshold (e.g., 90%) can the solution proposed be considered to reflect the consensus of the community.