WikiIndex:Namespace conventions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Examples of issues discussed: meta or general?) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→Examples of issues discussed: maybe :-) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* I believe [[TedErnst]] was trying to help me understand that [[RecursiveNatureOfWiki]] belonged somewhere else, perhaps [[WikiIndex: RecursiveNatureOfWiki]]. Is this what you were thinking Ted? Best, [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]] | * I believe [[TedErnst]] was trying to help me understand that [[RecursiveNatureOfWiki]] belonged somewhere else, perhaps [[WikiIndex: RecursiveNatureOfWiki]]. Is this what you were thinking Ted? Best, [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]] | ||
** I see articles about wiki in general, like the spam measures example above, as perfectly legitimate in the main namespace. As [[RecursiveNatureOfWiki]] stands right now, it seems like a meta conversation that would be better placed at [[WikiIndex: RecursiveNatureOfWiki]. Now I'm not sure I grok the concept so I might be missing it and maybe it really isn't meta issue for this wiki, but a larger issue of the WikiSphere, in which case it seems to me it should stay where it is. Is my way of thinking about these things helpful to anyone? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 13:50, 21 Jan 2006 (EST) | ** I see articles about wiki in general, like the spam measures example above, as perfectly legitimate in the main namespace. As [[RecursiveNatureOfWiki]] stands right now, it seems like a meta conversation that would be better placed at [[WikiIndex: RecursiveNatureOfWiki]. Now I'm not sure I grok the concept so I might be missing it and maybe it really isn't meta issue for this wiki, but a larger issue of the WikiSphere, in which case it seems to me it should stay where it is. Is my way of thinking about these things helpful to anyone? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 13:50, 21 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
* It is helpful, because I know you have ideas about organization, it is just us trying to discover our (diff)! :-) Do '''WikiIndex: Foo''' stay out of the random page generator? Or is it that they are labeled that way, and thus more easily disinguished by the average user? [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]] | |||
Revision as of 18:59, 21 January 2006
This wiki has many namespaces. How are we doing to use them, if at all? Template:TOCright
main
- All wiki entries
- Wiki people pages
- Normal Articles related to with WikiSphere in general, such as AntiSpamMeasures
- What else goes here?
WikiIndex
- Community Portal
- Do meta pages go here or main?
User
- Not used. Since automatic signatures link here, see the redirect at User:MarkDilley. It goes to MarkDilley, which has a link back to his user talk page.
User talk
- The user talk page is the only place where notification of messages will work.
Category
- Categories go here.
Template
- Templates go here.
Images
- Uploaded Logos
- Uploaded People Pictures
- Uploaded Charictures
Examples of issues discussed
- I believe TedErnst was trying to help me understand that RecursiveNatureOfWiki belonged somewhere else, perhaps WikiIndex: RecursiveNatureOfWiki. Is this what you were thinking Ted? Best, MarkDilley
- I see articles about wiki in general, like the spam measures example above, as perfectly legitimate in the main namespace. As RecursiveNatureOfWiki stands right now, it seems like a meta conversation that would be better placed at [[WikiIndex: RecursiveNatureOfWiki]. Now I'm not sure I grok the concept so I might be missing it and maybe it really isn't meta issue for this wiki, but a larger issue of the WikiSphere, in which case it seems to me it should stay where it is. Is my way of thinking about these things helpful to anyone? TedErnst 13:50, 21 Jan 2006 (EST)
- It is helpful, because I know you have ideas about organization, it is just us trying to discover our (diff)! :-) Do WikiIndex: Foo stay out of the random page generator? Or is it that they are labeled that way, and thus more easily disinguished by the average user? MarkDilley