User talk:Arcane: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Sturmkrieg: new section)
(→‎Sturmkrieg pages: new section)
Line 21: Line 21:


You say that people can make articles for forks of wikis.  That is what sturmkrieg.com would have to be.  They are a fork of the original Sturmkrieg project.  [[Sturmkrieg]] needs to be about the Sturmkrieg Empire wiki, because that is the original.  If Alex wants to create a historically revisionist version, he can do that.  You should know that he has been banned from a German website on the same topic for being sympathetic to the Red Army.  [[User:Sturmkrieger|Sturmkrieger]] ([[User talk:Sturmkrieger|talk]]) 08:40, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
You say that people can make articles for forks of wikis.  That is what sturmkrieg.com would have to be.  They are a fork of the original Sturmkrieg project.  [[Sturmkrieg]] needs to be about the Sturmkrieg Empire wiki, because that is the original.  If Alex wants to create a historically revisionist version, he can do that.  You should know that he has been banned from a German website on the same topic for being sympathetic to the Red Army.  [[User:Sturmkrieger|Sturmkrieger]] ([[User talk:Sturmkrieger|talk]]) 08:40, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
== Sturmkrieg pages ==
The background for the Sturmkrieg Empire is the predecessor for sturmkrieg.com.  If we're relegated to sturmkrieg.tk, why should they get [[Sturmkrieg]] when they are in fact the fork?  Regardless, why should they get a title that implies that they are somehow the main Sturmkrieg.  The original background was the Sturmkrieg Empire, before Inquisitor Ehrenstein and Dondrekhan decided to turn it away from what it was supposed to be.  If I have to have to start an article with some sort of different name, it implies that they are somehow the actual version and displays preference to them.  [[User:Sturmkrieger|Sturmkrieger]] ([[User talk:Sturmkrieger|talk]]) 15:41, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

Revision as of 22:41, 15 March 2013

Welcome to WikiIndex - glad you are here and want to know more about your "helping others with MediaWiki instillation" - sounds cool! Best, MarkDilley


You are, always, a boon to those you help Arcane.... Thank you... TeraS (talk) 19:15, 21 January 2013 (PST)

Can you get a screenshot?

And it looks like the page was not able to save? Best, MarkDilley

Hi, MediaWiki, logos, etc

Hi, good to see someone with good MediaWiki skills around here! :)

Do you known what threshold MediaWiki uses for breaking out of 'stub' article to full-on 'good' article?

And how are your logo creation skills? We really need a favicon for WikiIndex ...

Best, Sean, aka Hoof HeartedAdmintalk2HH 07:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

Sturmkrieg

You say that people can make articles for forks of wikis. That is what sturmkrieg.com would have to be. They are a fork of the original Sturmkrieg project. Sturmkrieg needs to be about the Sturmkrieg Empire wiki, because that is the original. If Alex wants to create a historically revisionist version, he can do that. You should know that he has been banned from a German website on the same topic for being sympathetic to the Red Army. Sturmkrieger (talk) 08:40, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

Sturmkrieg pages

The background for the Sturmkrieg Empire is the predecessor for sturmkrieg.com. If we're relegated to sturmkrieg.tk, why should they get Sturmkrieg when they are in fact the fork? Regardless, why should they get a title that implies that they are somehow the main Sturmkrieg. The original background was the Sturmkrieg Empire, before Inquisitor Ehrenstein and Dondrekhan decided to turn it away from what it was supposed to be. If I have to have to start an article with some sort of different name, it implies that they are somehow the actual version and displays preference to them. Sturmkrieger (talk) 15:41, 15 March 2013 (PDT)