User talk:Arcane: Difference between revisions
(→edit summary: new section) |
Zhuyifei1999 (talk | contribs) (reply moved) |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
Please delete the edit summary too or replace the summary with the word "spam" when deleting spam pages or the spam remains forever in the [[Special:Log/delete|deletion log]] and for a few hours on the main page due to the log appearing on recent changes.--[[User:Comets|Comets]] ([[User talk:Comets|talk]]) 01:54, 29 May 2013 (PDT) | Please delete the edit summary too or replace the summary with the word "spam" when deleting spam pages or the spam remains forever in the [[Special:Log/delete|deletion log]] and for a few hours on the main page due to the log appearing on recent changes.--[[User:Comets|Comets]] ([[User talk:Comets|talk]]) 01:54, 29 May 2013 (PDT) | ||
:Did not know that. Will make sure to do that in the future. | |||
[[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 04:25, 29 May 2013 (PDT)<!--Arcane--> |
Revision as of 11:52, 29 May 2013
Welcome to WikiIndex - glad you are here and want to know more about your "helping others with MediaWiki instillation" - sounds cool! Best, MarkDilley
Can you get a screenshot?
And it looks like the page was not able to save? Best, MarkDilley
Hi, MediaWiki, logos, etc
Hi, good to see someone with good MediaWiki skills around here! :)
Do you known what threshold MediaWiki uses for breaking out of 'stub' article to full-on 'good' article?
And how are your logo creation skills? We really need a favicon for WikiIndex ...
Best, Sean, aka Hoof Hearted • Admin • talk2HH 07:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
Sturmkrieg
You say that people can make articles for forks of wikis. That is what sturmkrieg.com would have to be. They are a fork of the original Sturmkrieg project. Sturmkrieg needs to be about the Sturmkrieg Empire wiki, because that is the original. If Alex wants to create a historically revisionist version, he can do that. You should know that he has been banned from a German website on the same topic for being sympathetic to the Red Army. Sturmkrieger (talk) 08:40, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
Sturmkrieg pages
The background for the Sturmkrieg Empire is the predecessor for sturmkrieg.com. If we're relegated to sturmkrieg.tk, why should they get Sturmkrieg when they are in fact the fork? Regardless, why should they get a title that implies that they are somehow the main Sturmkrieg. The original background was the Sturmkrieg Empire, before Inquisitor Ehrenstein and Dondrekhan decided to turn it away from what it was supposed to be. If I have to have to start an article with some sort of different name, it implies that they are somehow the actual version and displays preference to them. Sturmkrieger (talk) 15:41, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
Hey - group hug
Hi - thanks for your comment on my talk page. There is no need to appologise to me, but thanks anyway :)))) And I wish to appologise to you - I didn't mean to point any fingers at you. We were all new here once, and I certainly made my fair share of mistakes. You clearly have some great ideas and talents (I've noticed the results of your work on SuccuWiki, and TeraS is obviously very pleased with your efforts!). I think I was just getting a little annoyed by the petty attitude of that User:Sturmkrieger. Keep up your great work here! :) Sean, aka Hoof Hearted • Admin • talk2HH 10:43, 20 March 2013 (PDT)
Template:Sysop
the page can be undid to revision 168381. It worked well. But now there's noinclude in noinclude without exiting.
<noinclude>
[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Active administrators of this wiki]] tag their page with '''{{tl|sysop}}'''.
<noinclude>[[Category:Active administrators of this wiki]]
[[Category:People templates]]
[[Category:Housekeeping templates]]</noinclude>
--YiFei | talk 06:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
edit summary
Please delete the edit summary too or replace the summary with the word "spam" when deleting spam pages or the spam remains forever in the deletion log and for a few hours on the main page due to the log appearing on recent changes.--Comets (talk) 01:54, 29 May 2013 (PDT)
- Did not know that. Will make sure to do that in the future.