Template talk:Wiki boilerplate: Difference between revisions
(→size: moot section) |
(First additional) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Actually I think this is a good question... do we keep description. The best thing it is for is the edit button next to the template box, while not showing the crud under the hood. Can we do that some other way? Maybe make it a wiki specific byline? | :Actually I think this is a good question... do we keep description. The best thing it is for is the edit button next to the template box, while not showing the crud under the hood. Can we do that some other way? Maybe make it a wiki specific byline? | ||
== First additional == | |||
I really like the change to initially tag with Wikis to add. This means it gets an automatic review even if it has structured data already. I'm not so sure about the category first additional piece. Will people follow this example and link to categories with the colon instead of including the page in the categories? I kind of like the fact that first additional can be used as a cleanup category and we can review all new entries that end up there. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 10:52, 19 May 2006 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:52, 19 May 2006
description heading
The boilerplate we're using as a description heading. You seem to be deleting it on the wikis you're adding. Is that intentional? Could you please drop a note at Template talk:Wiki Boilerplate about this? Perhaps it needs changing? Thanks!
Why do we need the description heading? I think that it is obvious that an article about a wiki has a descripion of it. What else you are going to write there? Tristram Shandy 18:07, 8 Mar 2006 (EST)
- Actually I think this is a good question... do we keep description. The best thing it is for is the edit button next to the template box, while not showing the crud under the hood. Can we do that some other way? Maybe make it a wiki specific byline?
First additional
I really like the change to initially tag with Wikis to add. This means it gets an automatic review even if it has structured data already. I'm not so sure about the category first additional piece. Will people follow this example and link to categories with the colon instead of including the page in the categories? I kind of like the fact that first additional can be used as a cleanup category and we can review all new entries that end up there. TedErnst | talk 10:52, 19 May 2006 (EDT)