Template:RationalWiki: Difference between revisions
(Yes, but the link does not work! :-( - The domain of that wiki has changed: encyclopediadramatica.es) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (fix template categories) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''RationalWiki''' is an open [[wiki]] taking a | '''RationalWiki''' is an open [[wiki]] taking a [[:Category:Criticism|critical]] look at the [[:Category:Pseudoscience|pseudoscience]] movement and extremist [[:Category:Politics|politics]], through the use of side-by-side examinations and [[:Category:Humor|humor]]. | ||
Stated goals are: | Stated goals are: | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media. | *Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media. | ||
RationalWiki has about 4,723 registered accounts, of which 565 (or 12%) have [[sysop]] rights, which are awarded very liberally by the [[bureaucrat]]s. | The original [[:Category:Wiki English|English]] language [[RationalWiki]] has about 4,723 registered accounts, of which 565 (or 12%) have [[sysop]] rights, which are awarded very liberally by the [[bureaucrat]]s. | ||
RationalWiki runs a large collection of specially customized extensions allowing a wide range of features such as: up-down voting, slider voting, a site wide intercom system, and easy | RationalWiki runs a large collection of specially customized extensions allowing a wide range of features such as: up-down voting, slider voting, a site wide intercom system, and easy [[:Category:Bible|Bible]] quotations. | ||
RationalWiki also has a namespace dedicated to [[Conservapedia]]. | RationalWiki also has a namespace dedicated to [[Conservapedia]]. | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
RationalWiki started in | RationalWiki started in [[:Category:FoundedIn2007|May 2007]] after a group of editors at [[Conservapedia]] were banned over ideological differences with the authorities there. Their edits had consisted mostly of debating on talk pages, attempting to counteract what they perceived to be overwhelming anti-scientific and far-right political biases. Although the site was called RationalWiki to highlight the apparent pro-scientific worldview of the founders, the content was largely weighted to the perceived lunacy of events at Conservapedia. | ||
==RationalWiki today== | ==RationalWiki today== | ||
While [[Conservapedia]] continues to be a major source of traffic to RationalWiki (mainly, their [ | While [[Conservapedia]] continues to be a major source of traffic to RationalWiki (mainly, their [[RationalWiki:Conservapedia:What is going on at CP%3F|What is going on at Conservapedia?]] page), they have branched out into many areas of skepticism. Many articles focus on unfounded [[:Category:Medical|medical]] claims, pseudoscience, and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly [[:Category:Atheism|pro-atheist]], [[:Category:Religion|anti-religious]] stance, some editors are practicing Christians, Jews, Muslims, or Odinists (among others) tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism. However, most of the regular contributers to RationalWiki are devout atheists. | ||
The site works to refute a range of faith-based ideas as well as superstitions. They have critical material on Scientology, | The site works to refute a range of faith-based ideas as well as superstitions. They have critical material on [[:Category:Scientology|Scientology]], [[:Category:Christianity|Christianity]], [[:Category:Creationism|Creationism]], [[:Category:Astrology|Astrology]], "New Age" philosophy, and many others. It also comments critically on other Christian creationist wikis, like the relatively unnotable if it weren't for their editors joining up to argue with the founder, [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] (see [[RationalWiki:A Storehouse of Knowledge|RationalWiki: A Storehouse of Knowledge]]). | ||
The website has a rather idiosyncratic sense of humour, which includes widespread intentional misspellings and other peculiar phrases. There are many "inside jokes", particularly in the material relating to [[Conservapedia]], and the writing often has the tone of a close-knit social group. | The website has a rather idiosyncratic sense of humour, which includes widespread intentional misspellings and other peculiar phrases. There are many "inside jokes", particularly in the material relating to [[Conservapedia]], and the writing often has the tone of a close-knit social group. | ||
RationalWiki has one or two | RationalWiki has one or two [[:Category:GreatFeature|great features]] - readers can vote on their "what Is Going On" pages; there are random text generators for entertainment purposes - usually for parodying various figures at Conservapedia. | ||
Example of RationalWiki's perspective:- | Example of RationalWiki's perspective:- | ||
<blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [ | <blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [[RationalWiki:RationalWiki:Project Whitewash/What is a RationalWiki article|RationalWiki:What is a RationalWiki article]]''</blockquote> | ||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
Former [[Conservapedia]] sysop and [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] founder Philip J. Rayment harshly criticized RationalWiki as, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127] | Former [[Conservapedia]] sysop and [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] founder Philip J. Rayment harshly criticized RationalWiki as, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127] | ||
Many of those critical of RationalWiki refer to the website as "RatWiki" or "IrrationalWiki". [[Libertapedia]] has a [http://libertapedia.org/wiki/RationalWiki page critical of RW] referring to it as "IrrationaWiki". Although [[Liberapedia]] is mostly supportive of the wiki, it is critical of its perceived conservative bias. | Many of those critical of RationalWiki refer to the website as "RatWiki" or "IrrationalWiki". [[Libertapedia]] has a [http://libertapedia.org/wiki/RationalWiki page critical of RW] referring to it as "IrrationaWiki". Although [[Liberapedia]] is mostly supportive of the wiki, it is critical of its perceived conservative bias. | ||
==Satire== | ==Satire== | ||
Satirical articles on RationalWiki appear [ | Satirical articles on RationalWiki appear [[Uncyclopedia:RationalWiki|here]] in [[Uncyclopedia]] and [http://encyclopediadramatica.es/RationalWiki here] in [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]]. Uncyclopedia has a [[Uncyclopedia:HowTo:Play RationalTroll|page encouraging readers to vandalize the wiki]]. | ||
==RationalWiki Foundation== | ==RationalWiki Foundation== | ||
In July 2010 ownership of the website transferd to a non-profit foundation called the '''[ | In July 2010, ownership of the website transferd to a [[:Category:Nonprofit|non-profit]] foundation called the '''[[RationalWiki:RationalWiki:RationalWiki Foundation|RationalWiki Foundation]]'''. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[RationalWikiWiki]] meta site for RationalWiki | *[[RationalWikiWiki]] meta site for RationalWiki | ||
*[[Liberapedia]] started as a parody of [[Conservapedia]] | *[[Liberapedia]] started as a parody of [[Conservapedia]]; it is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content | ||
*[[RationalWikiWikiWiki]] criticism and discussion site of RationalWiki and RationalWikiWiki | *[[RationalWikiWikiWiki]] criticism and discussion site of RationalWiki and RationalWikiWiki | ||
==Similar wikis== | ==Similar wikis== | ||
* [[Debatepedia wiki]] also discusses controversial topics – but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page – RationalWiki also has side-by-side articles | *[[Debatepedia wiki]] also discusses controversial topics – but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page – RationalWiki also has side-by-side articles | ||
* [[Psiram]] – | *[[Psiram]] – a wiki similar in attitude (multilingual) | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
;<big><big>[[RationalWiki]] wikis in these [[:Category:Wiki Language|languages]]</big> <sup>([[edit:Template:RationalWiki|edit]])</sup></big> | ;<big><big>[[RationalWiki]] wikis in these [[:Category:Wiki Language|languages]]</big> <sup>([[edit:Template:RationalWiki|edit]])</sup></big> | ||
[[RationalWiki (en)|English (en)]] • [[RationalWiki (ru)|Russian / ру́сский (ru)]]</center><includeonly> | [[RationalWiki (en)|English (en)]] • [[RationalWiki (ru)|Russian / ру́сский (ru)]]</center><includeonly> | ||
[[Category:Criticism]] | |||
[[Category:Humor]] | |||
[[Category:Politics]] | |||
[[Category:Pseudoscience]] | |||
[[Category:Atheism]] | [[Category:Atheism]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Bible]] | ||
[[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]] | [[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]]</includeonly> | ||
</includeonly> | |||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
[[Category:Article templates]]</noinclude> | [[Category:Article templates]]</noinclude> | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ |
Revision as of 21:58, 23 October 2013
RationalWiki is an open wiki taking a critical look at the pseudoscience movement and extremist politics, through the use of side-by-side examinations and humor.
Stated goals are:
- Analyzing and refuting the anti-science movement, ideas and people.
- Analyzing and refuting the full range of crank ideas.
- Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism.
- Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media.
The original English language RationalWiki has about 4,723 registered accounts, of which 565 (or 12%) have sysop rights, which are awarded very liberally by the bureaucrats.
RationalWiki runs a large collection of specially customized extensions allowing a wide range of features such as: up-down voting, slider voting, a site wide intercom system, and easy Bible quotations.
RationalWiki also has a namespace dedicated to Conservapedia.
History
RationalWiki started in May 2007 after a group of editors at Conservapedia were banned over ideological differences with the authorities there. Their edits had consisted mostly of debating on talk pages, attempting to counteract what they perceived to be overwhelming anti-scientific and far-right political biases. Although the site was called RationalWiki to highlight the apparent pro-scientific worldview of the founders, the content was largely weighted to the perceived lunacy of events at Conservapedia.
RationalWiki today
While Conservapedia continues to be a major source of traffic to RationalWiki (mainly, their What is going on at Conservapedia? page), they have branched out into many areas of skepticism. Many articles focus on unfounded medical claims, pseudoscience, and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly pro-atheist, anti-religious stance, some editors are practicing Christians, Jews, Muslims, or Odinists (among others) tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism. However, most of the regular contributers to RationalWiki are devout atheists.
The site works to refute a range of faith-based ideas as well as superstitions. They have critical material on Scientology, Christianity, Creationism, Astrology, "New Age" philosophy, and many others. It also comments critically on other Christian creationist wikis, like the relatively unnotable if it weren't for their editors joining up to argue with the founder, A Storehouse of Knowledge (see RationalWiki: A Storehouse of Knowledge).
The website has a rather idiosyncratic sense of humour, which includes widespread intentional misspellings and other peculiar phrases. There are many "inside jokes", particularly in the material relating to Conservapedia, and the writing often has the tone of a close-knit social group.
RationalWiki has one or two great features - readers can vote on their "what Is Going On" pages; there are random text generators for entertainment purposes - usually for parodying various figures at Conservapedia.
Example of RationalWiki's perspective:-
As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. RationalWiki:What is a RationalWiki article
Criticism
Former Conservapedia sysop and A Storehouse of Knowledge founder Philip J. Rayment harshly criticized RationalWiki as, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[1]
Many of those critical of RationalWiki refer to the website as "RatWiki" or "IrrationalWiki". Libertapedia has a page critical of RW referring to it as "IrrationaWiki". Although Liberapedia is mostly supportive of the wiki, it is critical of its perceived conservative bias.
Satire
Satirical articles on RationalWiki appear here in Uncyclopedia and here in Encyclopedia Dramatica. Uncyclopedia has a page encouraging readers to vandalize the wiki.
RationalWiki Foundation
In July 2010, ownership of the website transferd to a non-profit foundation called the RationalWiki Foundation.
See also
- RationalWikiWiki meta site for RationalWiki
- Liberapedia started as a parody of Conservapedia; it is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content
- RationalWikiWikiWiki criticism and discussion site of RationalWiki and RationalWikiWiki
Similar wikis
- Debatepedia wiki also discusses controversial topics – but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page – RationalWiki also has side-by-side articles
- Psiram – a wiki similar in attitude (multilingual)
- RationalWiki wikis in these languages (edit)