Talk:Research Psychologist: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(argument for deletion of this page) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (re) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have nominated the page for deletion because this user was active on wikis where the creator of the page had administrative privileges, the user strongly criticized the page creator here,[http://childwiki.net/w/index.php?title=Racism&diff=prev&oldid=21310] and this information may be private. This is not a major figure in the wiki world, and WikiIndex enters perilous territory if it becomes a collection of pages like this, in pursuit of a private agenda. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 18:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | I have nominated the page for deletion because this user was active on wikis where the creator of the page had administrative privileges, the user strongly criticized the page creator here,[http://childwiki.net/w/index.php?title=Racism&diff=prev&oldid=21310] and this information may be private. This is not a major figure in the wiki world, and WikiIndex enters perilous territory if it becomes a collection of pages like this, in pursuit of a private agenda. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 18:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
:He has a very distinctive editing style. I don't know anyone else who uses HTML markup so extensively in his wikitext ''and'' has such a strong interest in eugenics. He's definitely a one-of-a-kind guy. Anyway, this isn't the first site to link the accounts; RationalWiki did the same. But whatever; if this site is only for authorized bios, then so be it. | |||
:How is it a private agenda? It's just information. People can do with it as they wish. He criticized me, but I didn't care. He was rather amusing and was a net positive to most wikis he participated in, especially [[ChildWiki]]. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 18:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:27, 10 March 2014
I have nominated the page for deletion because this user was active on wikis where the creator of the page had administrative privileges, the user strongly criticized the page creator here,[1] and this information may be private. This is not a major figure in the wiki world, and WikiIndex enters perilous territory if it becomes a collection of pages like this, in pursuit of a private agenda. --Abd (talk) 18:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- He has a very distinctive editing style. I don't know anyone else who uses HTML markup so extensively in his wikitext and has such a strong interest in eugenics. He's definitely a one-of-a-kind guy. Anyway, this isn't the first site to link the accounts; RationalWiki did the same. But whatever; if this site is only for authorized bios, then so be it.
- How is it a private agenda? It's just information. People can do with it as they wish. He criticized me, but I didn't care. He was rather amusing and was a net positive to most wikis he participated in, especially ChildWiki. Leucosticte (talk) 18:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)